I don't understand Chris Sheridan's picks for the national team...
His bench is way too guard heavy. I'm sorry, Wade doesn't deserve to be on this team. He's coming off major shoulder surgery, and he hasn't played a full season in two years. Plus, the team has enough slashing guards/small forwards in Bryant, James, Paul, Williams, Anthony and possibly Johnson. Since Wade doesn't bring anything different to the table, such as outside shooting or awesome defense, his role is essentially moot because others perform it already.
No Amare Stoudemire? He must be smoking rocks. If Stoudemire has concerns about injuries (as all the players do), then just play him in limited minutes (15-20 per, which is about what most players get anyways in a 40 min. game). The notion of leaving him off the team because he expressed those concerns is ridiculous. The US needs his size and rebounding on the inside.
As seen in 2004, I don't think Carlos Boozer fits the international game. He's too slow and lumbering to play help defense against high post screens/picks or d-up European big men who like to shoot from the outside. Also, he has a tendency to disappear in big games, and his freethrow shooting (a BIG US achilles heal) and mid-range shot is too inconsistent. He doesn't seem like the kind of player the US needs to be successful.
Mike Redd over Mike Miller? Sure, I believe Redd is overall a better player than Miller, but the US needs speciality players from the outside, and statisically, Miller is better than Redd at both 3pt.% and 3pt. made according to the league's official stats. It doesn't make sense to have a streaky shooter like Redd on the team when he can't consistently knock down the three when the US faces a zone heavy opponent. Despite the defensive liability, I'll take Miller over Redd all day.
Personally, I like Deron Williams, but in my book he's the odd man out when you consider that Paul, Kidd, and even James or Bryant can run the point effectively. The US would be better off acquiring another hustle player who can defend like Bruce Bowen or Tayshaun Prince. His outside shooting is definitely a bonus, but a third point guard in the mix might be one too many.
Starters: Kidd, Bryant, James, Anthony, Howard
Reserves: Wade, Boozer, Bosh, Paul, Williams, Redd and Chandler
Reserves: Wade, Boozer, Bosh, Paul, Williams, Redd and Chandler
No Amare Stoudemire? He must be smoking rocks. If Stoudemire has concerns about injuries (as all the players do), then just play him in limited minutes (15-20 per, which is about what most players get anyways in a 40 min. game). The notion of leaving him off the team because he expressed those concerns is ridiculous. The US needs his size and rebounding on the inside.
As seen in 2004, I don't think Carlos Boozer fits the international game. He's too slow and lumbering to play help defense against high post screens/picks or d-up European big men who like to shoot from the outside. Also, he has a tendency to disappear in big games, and his freethrow shooting (a BIG US achilles heal) and mid-range shot is too inconsistent. He doesn't seem like the kind of player the US needs to be successful.
Mike Redd over Mike Miller? Sure, I believe Redd is overall a better player than Miller, but the US needs speciality players from the outside, and statisically, Miller is better than Redd at both 3pt.% and 3pt. made according to the league's official stats. It doesn't make sense to have a streaky shooter like Redd on the team when he can't consistently knock down the three when the US faces a zone heavy opponent. Despite the defensive liability, I'll take Miller over Redd all day.
Personally, I like Deron Williams, but in my book he's the odd man out when you consider that Paul, Kidd, and even James or Bryant can run the point effectively. The US would be better off acquiring another hustle player who can defend like Bruce Bowen or Tayshaun Prince. His outside shooting is definitely a bonus, but a third point guard in the mix might be one too many.
Comment