• Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience
  • Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience

Power ranking! (Eurobasket 2015)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Straight forward2
  • Start date Start date
S

Straight forward2

Guest
So let's make speculations which for me personally is fun till early.

1. Spain. More vulnerable than used to be, but still red hot and explosive.
2. France. No-one can stop Parker + team and winning culture already here.
3. Lithuania. Winning culture, coherence + Dmo's brake out season.
4. Serbia. Because they are Balcan winners. They can go down but so any Balcan team and I choose Serbia for my chances.
5. Greece. Roster wise they could be on a pair with France or so, but they have some inner problems and currently the winning culture is not here.
6. Croatia. Saric, Bogdanovic other youngs getting closer for a big wins. Potentially.
7. Russia. Plenty of NBA players and solid Euroleague's options. They can bounch back with a good balance.
8. Slovenia. Defence and up-tempo storm. Scary, but breakable.
9. Turkey. Traditionally dangerous. Rarely among the top.
10. Bosnia and Herzegovina. Jusuf Nurkic, Teletovič and Balcan spirit.

11. Italy.
12. Germany.
13. Ukraine.
14. Finland.
15. Latvia.
16. F.Y.R. of Macedonia
17. Georgia,
18. Poland,
19. Israel.
20. Belgium.
21. Czech Republic.
22. Estonia.
23. Netherlands.
24. Iceland.
 
my top 10
1. France
2. Spain
3. Serbia
4. Lithuania
5. Greece
6. Italy
7. Croatia
8-10 Russia, Slovenia, Turkey
 
1. Spain
Filled on all positions, except for the coaching one. I think we got to the end of the problem in one of the WC14 threads regarding the pace of the game and Spanish role in it. Spain will have to change their basics, change the role of some players and there they go, they are a no.1 favourite again. That doesn't mean they can't get challenged by France on their home ground, or that some other teams would be a walk in the park.
2. France
I want to see Noah in the team, as well as Ajinca, together with Parker and Batum of course. They are second most stacked team in europe by now, what makes the difference for Spain are the Gasol bros. yet I've got a feeling Noah could be a pretty good neutraliser there
3. Serbia
A bit below France and Spain due to lacking of that very top class talent both of them have. Absolutely stacked on a bit lower level though, some NT's would kill for a PF as Mačvan, yet they've got at least 20 of those and Sale has a large base to choose from as he prooved in 14'. With teamwork and their "inat" they can surpass more talented teams than their own.
4. Greece
In need of a distinctive perimeter player to be put on pair with the above, sorry to Spanoulis fans, but opponent NT's more or less figured it out how to play against him and my guess is you'd need someone else with the game organisation to make it interesting. Stacked frontcourt and wings though. Only thinking about the SF's Papanikolau, Antetekoumpo, I'd actualy use Papapetrou as much as possible as well... pure envy.
5. Lithuania
2 and a half guards won't cut it over and over again and Lavrinovič brothers are getting old. 1st is a major deficit when playing those top4 teams (and a noticable deficit playing many more) and the 2nd (Lavrinović bros) was the best thing from Lithuania in 14', nevermind both tall stars. Motiejunas is improving in Houston, however both with Valanciunas will have to perform noticably better with their NT than they realisticaly (unlike statisticaly in some instances) did in the past.
6. Croatia
Great individual potential, somewhat underperforming. I'd place them on the same level as Greece for example, if it wasn't for the personality issues an ussualy well informed friend of mine has been claiming some of the Croatian players are having, which imo make for less than an ideal team. As much as that might hurt I think Croatia would be better of switching to the young guns and ignoring some of the old supposed "stars" at the same time... definately isn't likely to happen at their "own" eurobasket though.
7. Slovenia
Limited frontcourt with no new talents anywhere in sight and already pretty much stacked backcourt, without even all those talents coming in the next 4-5 years, not as stable of a team as it could be, accordingly. Begić and Vidmar might do the trick against some teams, but hardly vs. the best ones. We have to stop breeding all those not-a-center midgets dammit!
8. Italy
Hackett/Aradori/Gentile/Galinarri/Bargnani - enough said. Finding the right chemistry (you know me, I'd probably leave Bargnani at home actualy) they're anywhere from the medals to the early elimination if something just doesn't fit. As ussual
9. Russia
Russia improved it's own depth significantly in the last few years and imo will continue to do so untill they'll actually end up with number of players usable in euroleague. One thing that remains will be their defensive orientation. With that in mind, I've seen similary ranked teams suddenly surprising everyone for a semi-finals. Or will there once again be a general confusion regarding everything and everyone with their NT?
10. BiH
Will Nurkić actully play? if he does they're at no.10 if he doesn't, quite a few spots lower than that
11. Turkey
Honestly, I don't think it's worth it this time to send the same old granpa's to the championship, if I were Turkish head coach, I'd go with an experience-youth mix and almost forget about result overall as long as there would be 2-3 new players in the rotation.
12. Germany
Schroeder, Their, Pleiss, Benzing, Tadda, Staiger, Giffey are a good not exactly the youngest, but far from old core that will take a championship or two before becoming quite dangerous imho. I'd throw out some of the older players accordingly. Unless Dirk might come of course.
13. Latvia
Basicaly 13', 11', 09' and 07' have all been the same story over and over again for Latvia. Having a bunch of good teams in the group, loosing some games as expected, than after playing well succumbing by 1 point to some teams and one way or the other, dropping out of the 2nd stage. Preferably that includes playing actuall good bball untill losing to Portugal as in 07'. Their youngsters should take over along with Blums and Strelnieks, since in a few years those young players as Porzigins, Timma, Silins, Bertans, Mareks are easily a top10 (or likely better than that) team quality wise.
14. Georgia
A naturalised US PG as ussual, "Air Georgia", Pachulia, Shengelia, Tsintsadze, Shermadini, Markoishvilli it all depends on weather all 7 of those will appear or only 5 of them. They'll have a short rotation in just about any case, but having 7 of them is actualy exponentialy better than 5 and would make them one of the frontrunners for the 15' eurobasket surprise team
15. Ukraine
Say what you want, but Fratello knows basketball, he is doing an incredible job with incredibly limited team and I expect him to continue to do so. I don't think Ukraine would once again manage to get to places like in the last eurobasket, but they should definately be taken as a serious team.
16. Finland
After the World Championship I was pretty much sure Dettman needs to be replaced as what used to be an interesting game scheme seemed to be falling apart against competitors that weren't even superior to Finns individualy.
17. Israel
After being in top10 for so long, it now seems some other countries have made a step forward that Israel hasn't. They can still assemble a decent team if they choose to, however so does Belgium and Poland.
18. Poland
If they naturalised one euroleague level US guard... well, just saying... if!... it could be a different story.
19. Belgium
Good defensive all-round team. In tournaments like these the basic defensive abilities are the most important substance to start with, exactly as we've seen with Belgium in 13'
20. Czech Rep
Well, Satoransky and Vesely might be able to stage some surprises with some help
21. Macedonia
To me Gečevski and Čekovski were the soul of this team, without them short roster even got shorter and the replacement aren't on the same level any way you look at it.
22.-24 Netherlands, Estonia, Iceland
Apologies, I've never seen any of these 3 play and have no idea about what to expect, except Jon Steffanson tearing it up and hopefully Hafthor Bjornsson taking up basketball again and battle it out with baby Shaq :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will repeat myself from previous thread..

So.. this is qualification Eurobasket for Olympics.. I can imagine that all teams will be at full strength (except those with injuries).. So.. with that in mind.. I put my preliminary ranking for all teams..


1.
Spain
France

2.
Serbia (I’ll not put them in first bracket because of one tournament.. They need to show consistency)
Greece

Lithuania (Kalnietis, Kleiza and Javtokas will be back ? That gives hope..

M. Kalnietis, …………..,
R. Seibutis, M. Pocius, ……………,
J. Maciulis, M. Kuzminskas,
D. Motiejunas, L. Kleiza, P. Jankunas,
J. Valanciunas, R. Javtokas.

….That looks pretty strong team to me…)

Slovenia
Croatia
Russia (Is it possible that Khryapa, Monya and Kirilenko will come back for the last run at olympics ?)

3.
Turkey
Italy
Germany (edited: I'll put them in the 3rd bracket if they have Nowitzki)

4.
Finland
BiH
Ukraine
Latvia

5.
Poland
Israel
Macedonia
Georgia
Czech republic
Belgium

6.
Iceland
Netherlands
Estonia
 
Great job JPF!

This will be a massive tournament, one of more equal pre-Olympic Eurobasket I'm guessing. Logically and objectively (roster wise) I agree that Serbia and Greece should be in front of Lithuania (probably Croatia as well), but Lithuania's all core has Olympic experience and Lithuania proved many times it can beat stronger teams on the paper. My top 3 is still traditional European Olympic teams - Spain, France, Lithuania. Every time we do those rankings I hear how deep and so much in front Balkan teams are (usually Serbia and Greece), but they fail to bring it in the best competition. I'm not buying that till they won't really prevail and will get to Olympics and will make some noise there. Heck of tournament it will be because Lithuania, Serbia, Croatia, Greece and Slovenia will have better teams than they had in 2011. It will be a stronger pre-Olympic Eurobasket unless injuries.
 
Joško Poljak Fan;950142 said:
8. Italy
Hackett/Aradori/Gentile/Galinarri/Bargnani - enough said. Finding the right chemistry (you know me, I'd probably leave Bargnani at home actualy) they're anywhere from the medals to the early elimination if something just doesn't fit. As ussual
Why don't you consider Belinelli and Datome?

in my opinion Spain and France are the main favoruite of the next EC...

Croatia and Greece could be two outsider if they have the best roster...

1 France
2 Spain
3 Greece
4 Croatia
 
my prediction

my prediction

Group A (Montpellier):
France
Finland
BiH
Poland
Israel
Russia

Group B (Berlin):
Spain
Serbia
Turkey
Italy
Germany
Iceland

Group C (Zagreb):
Croatia
Slovenia
Greece
Macedonia
Georgia
Netherlands

Group D (Riga):
Lithuania
Ukraine
Latvia
Belgium
Czech republic
Estonia

To fight for a medal, they can only prevent its con myself met before the semi-finals:
France;Lithuania;Spain

If the first three teams will meet in the semi-finals before, have a chance:
Serbia;Croatia;Greece;Slovenia

low chances to enter the semi-finals:
Turkey;Germany;Russia

the remaining teams will be a great achievement to rise above 10 place:
BiH
Poland
Macedonia
Ukraine
Latvia
Belgium
 
Why don't you consider Belinelli and Datome?

in my opinion Spain and France are the main favoruite of the next EC...

Croatia and Greece could be two outsider if they have the best roster...

1 France
2 Spain
3 Greece
4 Croatia
I've wrote this in a pretty fast manner and just assembled a nice starting 5, remembered about Datome halfway through and Belinelli didn't cross my mind untill you've mentioned it :) - it was mostly just a really nice lineup that can basicaly compete with the best. If I try it again, I'd definately go with Belinelli on SG and Datome on SF IF (!!!) the players and the coach would get along and some of those players would realise there is only 1 ball to play with. Something I suspect that was an issue in 2011. Otherwise Italy is the team with a big upside on that list as far as I am concerned as semifinals shouldn't even be some crazy surprise imho.

Great job JPF!

This will be a massive tournament, one of more equal pre-Olympic Eurobasket I'm guessing. Logically and objectively (roster wise) I agree that Serbia and Greece should be in front of Lithuania (probably Croatia as well), but Lithuania's all core has Olympic experience and Lithuania proved many times it can beat stronger teams on the paper. My top 3 is still traditional European Olympic teams - Spain, France, Lithuania. Every time we do those rankings I hear how deep and so much in front Balkan teams are (usually Serbia and Greece), but they fail to bring it in the best competition. I'm not buying that till they won't really prevail and will get to Olympics and will make some noise there. Heck of tournament it will be because Lithuania, Serbia, Croatia, Greece and Slovenia will have better teams than they had in 2011. It will be a stronger pre-Olympic Eurobasket unless injuries.
Well, I realise you guys are really proud of your team, and you've got many reasons for that. However from a purely power standing point, I think Lithuania is not on pair with Serbs or Greece. Apart from Motiejunas and Valanciejunas that aren't really functioning to start with, who's that extra guy? Kalnietis? he is okay, sure there are some nice players around as well, but from a power standings perspective I don't think that's all that better than what Italy can come up with - in fact If It wasn't for the past chemistry screwups with Italy and great fighting spirit with Lithuania, I'd switch them both around in a no time.
The fact is (well at least supposed to be) some of the Croats are mental, Slovenia lacks height and talent, Italy lacked chemistry and Russia played horrible on past occasions. That's why in my eyes Lithuania leads the 2nd following group.

I understand some Lithuanian fans are enthusiastic, surely they think more of Jasaitis as he is constantly on their watch, just as I think more of E.Murič, some Croat thinks more of Rudež, Serb will consider more of Kalinić, Italian will consider them all 2nd level compared to Gentile, Greeks are frustrated as noone considers Antetekoumpo and Russians laugh as Monya will neutralize half of the players above... so on untill the judgement day...
Compared to those stacked teams Lithuania had in Sydney and later, it's a no match. This team plays good and team oriented basketball, with good definition of roles, using some of the strongpoints and minimizing some of the weak-points in a great manner, but nevertheless is not a talent packed team I'd expect some 3rd ranked NT to be. Lithuania might easily get to medaly once again, just that as far as power ranking goes, I expect some other teams to have higher chances for that.
I'm sorry that some Lithuanians might take this post offensive, but it's just my honest point of view.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Lithuania has excellent chances to fight for the gold.

1. Kalnietis and Juškevičius - is your club team leaders, players start
1-2 Seibutis - now it is a good game, his team start a club player.
2 Pocius - always reliably playing in the national team, explosive player
3 Maciulis - played for one of the best clubs in Europe, Kuzminskas ,Gailius, Orelikas is your club team leaders, players start.
3-4 Kleiza- is excellent (star) player, only Armani coach guilty that he and his team was not playing well.
4 Jankūnas - good black workers on the team.
4-5 Motiejūnas-one of the best NBA team, the start player
5 Valančiūnas-one of the best NBA team, the start player, the dominant center in Europe
5 Javtokas- always reliably playing in the national team, especially in defense
5 Gudaitis -have made good progress player

There are still great players: D and K. Lavrinovič, Jasaitis, Kavaliauskas, Gecevičius


Kazlauskas - one of the best coach in Europe
 
I think Lithuania has excellent chances to fight for the gold.

1. Kalnietis and Juškevičius - is your club team leaders, players start
1-2 Seibutis - now it is a good game, his team start a club player.
2 Pocius - always reliably playing in the national team, explosive player
3 Maciulis - played for one of the best clubs in Europe, Kuzminskas ,Gailius, Orelikas is your club team leaders, players start.
3-4 Kleiza- is excellent (star) player, only Armani coach guilty that he and his team was not playing well.
4 Jankūnas - good black workers on the team.
4-5 Motiejūnas-one of the best NBA team, the start player
5 Valančiūnas-one of the best NBA team, the start player, the dominant center in Europe
5 Javtokas- always reliably playing in the national team, especially in defense
5 Gudaitis -have made good progress player

There are still great players: D and K. Lavrinovič, Jasaitis, Kavaliauskas, Gecevičius


Kazlauskas - one of the best coach in Europe

Now take one by one players of f.e. Spain and France and make comparison with LT, then tell me if our chances for gold are really that excellent as you say...
 
G&B, it's not roster's analysing thread, let's stick to rankings. Besides, you overestimated judging every single player you mentioned.

JPG, I completely agree, but it comes when you take figure by figure. Even when you take it other ways it's still strange how post 2008 Lithuania came up with decent/good results, but it's just happens. To put it short, we have culture that some more talented teams don't. Besides, admitting that Serbia and Greece have substantially more balanced teams and stronger individuals I still could ask you the same question - who is those special talents that Serbia, Greece, Croatia has that strong strategy/culture of Lithuania couldn't overcome? You would say Teodosič, Spanoulis and Sarič? I agree that first 2 are really talented, but they are not as big as say Šaras was for Lithuania, Diamantidis,Papaloukas due for Greece (and so on) in my account. Just as you I'm missing special talents that has really special skills and IQ, but current Greece and Serbia don't have those players currently as well...Besides, Dmo should start getting credit here if praise current stars of Greece, Serbia, Croatia (Croatia's best talents is only yet to come though). He has some IQ and special skills and slowly getting together to become special. I mean JV's and Motiejunas' extra factor won't be lesser than any teams' except France or Spain very soon if not this summer already so I don't buy you extra player argument. But as you said...... so on until the judgement day...those upcoming huge tournaments will clear out the situation after Spain and France. Now in the middle of 10's it's a little bit tricky, most teams are sort of in transition of growing path and it's a bit mysterious who will prevail.
 
JPF overall as tallent goes you are right.I dont think Lithuania are in top3 by just tallent.Greece,Croatia,maybe even Italy has more overall tallent i agree here.BUT WE HAVE A TEAM THAT PLAYS TOGETHER AS UNIT and gives everything they got every year...that is the difference,why Lithuania usualy performs better than more tallented teams like Greece,Croatia,Slovenia,Italy and so on.

If you look at our 2015 team, you would see 2 rising stars Valanciunas And Motiejunas.But what makes as strong now is players (1985 generation) that plays together for manny years Kalnietis,Maciulis,Jankunas,Seibutis,Pocius,Kleiza its 1985 generation that played together from youngsters days ( they won WCh u-21 in 2005 and bronze in 2010 WCH).They undersdant each other without words and add to this proven players some 2-3 super young tallents (Valanciunas,Motiejunas,Kuzminskas) we have a very dangerous team.Everybody says Kleiza is washed up,maybe its so,but i have a feeling he still will give some good moments next summer when he gonna team up again with his old teammates,that knows how to make the best of Kleiza.We most likely will be in top8 and there 1/4 game will decide...If everyhting goes bad Kazlauskas will have some old horses that can change the game Lavrinovich Bros and Javtokas.

Lets return to topic:

1.France i feel right now they are better than anybody in europe with Parker playing.
2.Spain that bad tournament will motivated that golden generation for one more run.
3.Greece they were very unlucky last summer,but they shown very good basketball.
4.Lithuania
5.Serbia


This 5 nations have winning mentality in basketball this is my top 5 for eurobasket 2015.

Croatia,Italy,Slovenia,Turkey,Russia they have tallent enough to win even medal,but do they have enough mental strenght to win most important games ?
 
G&B, it's not roster's analysing thread, let's stick to rankings. Besides, you overestimated judging every single player you mentioned.

JPG, I completely agree, but it comes when you take figure by figure. Even when you take it other ways it's still strange how post 2008 Lithuania came up with decent/good results, but it's just happens. To put it short, we have culture that some more talented teams don't. Besides, admitting that Serbia and Greece have substantially more balanced teams and stronger individuals I still could ask you the same question - who is those special talents that Serbia, Greece, Croatia has that strong strategy/culture of Lithuania couldn't overcome? You would say Teodosič, Spanoulis and Sarič? I agree that first 2 are really talented, but they are not as big as say Šaras was for Lithuania, Diamantidis,Papaloukas due for Greece (and so on) in my account. Just as you I'm missing special talents that has really special skills and IQ, but current Greece and Serbia don't have those players currently as well...Besides, Dmo should start getting credit here if praise current stars of Greece, Serbia, Croatia (Croatia's best talents is only yet to come though). He has some IQ and special skills and slowly getting together to become special. I mean JV's and Motiejunas' extra factor won't be lesser than any teams' except France or Spain very soon if not this summer already so I don't buy you extra player argument. But as you said...... so on until the judgement day...those upcoming huge tournaments will clear out the situation after Spain and France. Now in the middle of 10's it's a little bit tricky, most teams are sort of in transition of growing path and it's a bit mysterious who will prevail.
You are right of course :) Agree to a lot of what you're saying and we're basicaly thinking pretty much alike. I've probably taken the power rankings in an different aspect.

About those special talents of Serbia, Greece and Croatia that are hard to overcome... it's easier about Slovenia since it's only Dragič and noone else in particular :P... anyway. I think Greece and Serbia has them. Papanikolau, Spanoulis, Antetekoumpo (yes, I'm pretty much impressed with him), Zissis and some additional really good PF's, good defending guards, I think it's a clear advantage roster-wise, as long as their chemistry is working and their guards don't overplay which they ussualy do. As far as Serbia goes they're pretty much unpredictable, while that excellent talent might not be all that deep mostly Teodošić, Raduljica, Bjelica, Bogdanović they've got a rock solid 11th, 12th and even 30th guy if they wanted to, enableing them to fully make up an NT of their preference as long as their coach gets that.
Croatia has some of the best talent on the world however some of it among the biggest underperformers as well. It's basicaly Bogdanović, Tomić, Simon (ignore Unicaja when evaluating anyone :P ), Šarić and Hežonja will be there shortly, with some potential combination of great role players to put along. However placing them behind Lithuania was imo a reasonable move.
 
I've wrote this in a pretty fast manner and just assembled a nice starting 5, remembered about Datome halfway through and Belinelli didn't cross my mind untill you've mentioned it :) - it was mostly just a really nice lineup that can basicaly compete with the best. If I try it again, I'd definately go with Belinelli on SG and Datome on SF IF (!!!) the players and the coach would get along and some of those players would realise there is only 1 ball to play with. Something I suspect that was an issue in 2011. Otherwise Italy is the team with a big upside on that list as far as I am concerned as semifinals shouldn't even be some crazy surprise imho.
Ok,i agree completely with your post...the only difference compared to three years ago is the depth of the bench,not more old or inadequate people like maestranzi,carraretto or mordente,but euroleague level players like hackett,aradori,melli and gentile..
 
JPF overall as tallent goes you are right.I dont think Lithuania are in top3 by just tallent.Greece,Croatia,maybe even Italy has more overall tallent i agree here.BUT WE HAVE A TEAM THAT PLAYS TOGETHER AS UNIT and gives everything they got every year...that is the difference,why Lithuania usualy performs better than more tallented teams like Greece,Croatia,Slovenia,Italy and so on.

If you look at our 2015 team, you would see 2 rising stars Valanciunas And Motiejunas.But what makes as strong now is players (1985 generation) that plays together for manny years Kalnietis,Maciulis,Jankunas,Seibutis,Pocius,Kleiza its 1985 generation that played together from youngsters days ( they won WCh u-21 in 2005 and bronze in 2010 WCH).They undersdant each other without words and add to this proven players some 2-3 super young tallents (Valanciunas,Motiejunas,Kuzminskas) we have a very dangerous team.Everybody says Kleiza is washed up,maybe its so,but i have a feeling he still will give some good moments next summer when he gonna team up again with his old teammates,that knows how to make the best of Kleiza.We most likely will be in top8 and there 1/4 game will decide...If everyhting goes bad Kazlauskas will have some old horses that can change the game Lavrinovich Bros and Javtokas.

Lets return to topic:

1.France i feel right now they are better than anybody in europe with Parker playing.
2.Spain that bad tournament will motivated that golden generation for one more run.
3.Greece they were very unlucky last summer,but they shown very good basketball.
4.Lithuania
5.Serbia


This 5 nations have winning mentality in basketball this is my top 5 for eurobasket 2015.

Croatia,Italy,Slovenia,Turkey,Russia they have tallent enough to win even medal,but do they have enough mental strenght to win most important games ?

Greece were not only unlucky last summer. They were also weak in the center position. Basically all they had in the paint was Bourousis and were therefore compromised. If at least one of Koufos, Mavrokefalidis or Sofo will join Bourousis, Greece may be a force to reckon with. Otherwise nothing is guaranteed. It is almost impossible to be a contender with a clear weakness in the Center position.

As for Lithuania's success. They have tradition and play as a team, but in recent tournaments they'we had some good draws too.
 
BTW, speaking about France and Spain, France is becoming scary deep us well with Fournier and Gobert improving in the NBA. Gasols will be able to held anything if needed, but France looks stacked if all will come:

Parker, De colo
Fournier
Batum, Gelabale
Diaw
Noah, Gobert

That's all NBA calibre players and the starting line up is deadly...
 
what about rosters of france and spain?what about ajinca,noah,gasol brothers,calderon?
 
History has proven that Spain, without Pau Gasol and Navarro, are very fragile. In fact, this generation never won anything without them. Even if they decide to show up, they won´t be as good as they used to be since they are past their prime. So is Reyes and Calderon. Hence the disappointing result in Spain. Basically without Pau Gasol and Navarro, Spain looses the cutting edge and becomes simply a good team. One that can be beaten by any other good team.

As for France, they lack one big success in order to be considered the team to beat like Spain used to be until 2012. They won one Eurobasket against Spain without P. Gasol and Navarro and they won some medals in recent tournaments. People expect them to bring out the best team ever, but expectations can be anti-productive. There are some other very good teams out there which can be lethal for a team which is favored to win. Three or four other teams are just so very close level wise, and if they gain momentum they can be lethal.

In other words, this may yet be a very exciting Eurobasket.
 
1. Croatia. Amazing amount of great young players and seems like every day there is new one. If they choose best Croatian coach Velimir Perasović for a new national team coach they will be just great.

2. Spain. After disappointing World Cup on home court, they will be hungry.

3. France. Great team and tournament will be held in their country.

4. Greece. They always play good, no matters who is in the roster and who isn't.

5. Slovenia. Such an underestimated team. And half of their roster are Bosnians or have Bosnian origin:rolleyes:

6. Lithuania. Same as Greece, they are constantly in the top teams.

7. Serbia. They were amazing on World Cup. I just don't belive they can play so good on two consecutive tournaments.

8. Ukraine. it amazes me how good they play with team made of bunch of anonymous.

9. Poland. NBA center Gortat + players from domestic championship which isn't bad at all, seems good.

10. Italy. Their performances are disappointing, they must change something.

11.Turkey. They have great players, but their games are terrible to watch even when they win. If they are football team, their wins would always be 1 : 0.

12. Latvia. They are very nonconstant, able to win and lose against anybody.

13. Germany. This is without Wunder Dirk. With him, they are higher on my list.

14. Georgia. Dark horse.

15. Russia. They are in downfall.

16. Macedonia. They had their 15 minutes of fame on Eurobasket 2011.

17. Czech. Two good players(Veseli, Satoransky).

18. Belgium. They once again had luck in the draw, lucky team they are indeed.

19. Bosnia and Herzegovina. If they win one game, it's fine. I'm not really interested for this generation, next generation made of our player born 1994 - 1999 will be capable of much greater achievements.

20. Israel. They actually don't have so bad players as much as bad they play.

21. Finland. Their only tactics is to shoot threes as much as it is possible.

22. Netherlands. They eliminated Montenegro, that means something.

23. Iceland. They play some weird fast basketball with sometimes 4 short players and 1 tall. If they were not in such a strong group, they could suprise somebody.

24. Estonia. Never heard about their national team, some club or player. If the Eurobasket stayed for 16 teams, I guess teams like this would never appear.
 
Back
Top