(Please keep in mind that this article was first published in 2017 and has been updated to include 2022 information)

With Russell Westbrook winning the 2016-17 NBA MVP award on an above average Oklahoma City Thunder team, that brought out the perennial debate to the ‘most valuable’ designation. More specifically, what should be considered when awarding the NBA’s premier individual trophy?

How much should voters value winning? How heavy should that player’s contribution weigh in the decision?

What Factors Determines “Most Valuable”

What does “most valuable” mean?

The NBA MVP award has quickly become a yearly discussion in how to define it, what criteria should be weighed and which factors should have the most influence? There are several angles one can take when discussing the merits of the NBA’s Most Valuable Player award, but the argument every year seems to boil down to two main interpretations of “most valuable”.

The first argument isn’t complicated; it’s basically the best player on one of the top 4-5 teams in the league (record-wise).

The other argument takes “Most Valuable Player” much more literally; they argue that the “most valuable” is exactly that — the player that means the most to their team. The hypothetical that’s used most often is if we were to magically remove that player from the team and replaced with an average player, that team would be (even more of) a complete mess.

Most seasons, those two conversations coalesce and make voting for the two or three MVP candidates easy, but every few years there’s a player having such an extraordinary season that despite his team’s record, he forces his name into the conversation. The player is no doubt one of the best players that season, yet their team isn’t in any serious conversations for the NBA Championship.

Which Teams had the NBA MVP and Fewest Wins?

An extraordinary player playing on an ordinary team isn’t rare, it happens multiple times every NBA season. In the annals of NBA history, there were plenty of players that were special, but weren’t able to lead their teams to the enough playoff glory.  A few of the names that come to mind are Dominique Wilkins, Chris Webber, Alex English, Tracy McGrady, Chris Paul and Carmelo Anthony. These players may have played on some very good teams, but they never won an MVP (nor did they ever play in an NBA Finals as the #1 option).

Having an extraordinary player on an average team as a serious MVP contender begs the question — which MVPs played for the “worst” teams in NBA history? Worst in the sense of wins/losses during the regular season. And was there ever a team that featured the MVP and had a record that fell below .500?

Yes. And we have the answers below sorted by their teams’ win percentage.

We only included those “MVP teams” that had a win/loss record below a .600% winning percentage.

As you can see, the “MVP team” that was the worst of the worst was the NBA’s first ever MVP, the St. Louis Hawks and Bob Pettit. In 1955-56, Pettit’s Hawks ended with a record of 33-39, placing them sixth out of the league’s eight teams. Those Hawks were just one of two of the teams on this list that fell below .500 for the season.

Even with a better winning percentage, Kareem’s 1976 Laker team wasn’t much better. That team tied for ninth out of the NBA’s 18 teams at the time. KAJ’s Lakers are the only team on the list not to make the NBA playoffs which makes his MVP season have the biggest of asterisks. Yikes.

Russell Westbrook’s Amazing Season Yields MVP

The most recent example was Westbrook’s MVP award for a 47-35 Thunder team. Their record was sixth in the Western Conference and the tenth best record in the league. Still, Russ’s unbelievable season of triple doubles and clutch performances were enough to convince the voters that he was more valuable than James Harden‘s Rockets (55-27) as well as other great players on great teams that season: LeBron James‘ Cavs (51-31), the Warriors’ Kevin Durant and Steph Curry (67-15), Kawhi Leonard‘s Spurs (61-21) and Isaiah Thomas‘ Celtics (53-29).

Winning Matters Most for MVPs (Usually)

It’s insightful to have the MVP’s team records to evaluate when and how the trophy has been awarded in the past. Of the 63 NBA MVPs from the 1955-56 season to the 2016-17 season, here’s how their teams fared:

• 39 played for the team with that year’s best regular season record.
• 23 of them won that season’s championship.

Since 2000, only two league MVPs have fallen below .600 winning percentage line. And for the most part the vast majority of the MVPs played on teams with a overall record that was .700 or over.

Only twice in the last 22 years did a player win the MVP with a win % less than .600 — Westbrook in 2017 and Nikola Jokic in 2022. Outside of that, it wasn’t even close. The other 20 MVPs were on teams that were won well-above .600% of their regular season games. In fact, they were all above .650. The next closest was Steve Nash’s Phoenix Suns with a relatively-weak .659.

With that in front of us and seeing as there’s only been seven MVPs that had teams that finished below .600 in NBA’s 60+ years, it’s safe to say that winning is the biggest factor when determining the league’s MVP. Putting it another way, approximately 9% of all regular season MVPs were given to players that had a very special season, but their teams weren’t nearly as great record-wise. On the other side, more than 90% of the time an MVP’s team finished well above the .600 mark and was usually one of the top one, two or three teams in the entire league. If we’re looking at NBA history, winning matters the most when looking at “most valuable”.