Germany is not going to defend as well as the Czechs, nor will they have their passing game. Papagiannis and Giannis will score a lot of points. However, the Greek perimeter defense will be the key to victory for tonight's match, the better the better the chances of qualification
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eurobasket 2022 - Round of 16
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Nemanja95 View PostExcellent ball distribution of Italy from one side to another, using advantage of Melli shoots and reading the defense. Moving without ball like team and especially of some players like Polonara, Spissu or Fotnecchio. Good first pass and good spacing on offense transition. POwer of improvisation. Bad our pn defense on drop, on side help and on swich, for example Kalinic didn't can defend Melli on low post, Jokic cannot follow Melli on 3p. Spissu before he made 6 shoots, 3 open shoots has missed. In defense Italy used mobility of defense to play narrow because bad ball distribution of Serbia, and not reliable shooters of Serbia.previously known as Beno
Comment
-
Originally posted by Killer Bob View PostAll these wouldn't mattered, if Pesic had benched Milutinov after Q1 and played Jokic much more.
Jokic scored a lot of points, some points he made in the finish when is game over, however. Jokic didn't strucutally changed anything our or their play, except mathematically he scored points. In that sense I disagree, if he would be 4 minutes more, what will happen ? We would make 1 one or two shoots more, and what'll change this? To not be in -12 pneither to be in -9 . Pesic tried with Jagodic Kuridza on pf in beginning of 4th quarter to make counter-balance to Italy, it didn't work, because he hasn't enoguh quality, we didn't move ball closer to basket.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nemanja95 View PostI disagree. Italy well used Jokic's defensive lacks, also he in offense had problems to get good position, he made some hard shoots in contact over two players for example and he fought for fouls, what produced more points from Serbia in first half because Italy all the time defensively played same, because we had a lot of free throws. We didn't use soft narrowing on post on Jokic, he passed the ball for 3p players in some situations, but it didn't help, we couldn't establish connection him and other players inside. Italy made excellent rotations from one to another, our immobile offense and bad ball distribution helped them in this way.
Jokic scored a lot of points, some points he made in the finish when is game over, however. Jokic didn't strucutally changed anything our or their play, except mathematically he scored points. In that sense I disagree, if he would be 4 minutes more, what will happen ? We would make 1 one or two shoots more, and what'll change this? To not be in -12 pneither to be in -9 . Pesic tried with Jagodic Kuridza on pf in beginning of 4th quarter to make counter-balance to Italy, it didn't work, because he hasn't enoguh quality, we didn't move ball closer to basket.previously known as Beno
Comment
-
Originally posted by Killer Bob View PostGame was lost in 11 minutes that Milutinov has played. +/- might not realistically show value of the players, but -19 in 11 minutes Milutinov played shows that lineup with Milutinov didn't work. You're forgetting that Jokic is not only scorer, but a player crucial for offensive system Serbia is playing.
Comment
-
EUROLEAGUEADDICTED
Comment
-
Originally posted by Killer Bob View PostI want Italy, because it's very difficult to beat the same opponent twice and I want for Luka to score 50+. I can't see anyone to guard him in Italian roster.
But first Poland. I'm always afraid what happens in those "easy" games.
Comment
Comment