European NT Coefficient Ranking

[LuDux]

Didn't realize it's not FIBA rankings thread

Hey guys, thank you both for your input.

@LuDux. Yes, Fiba have their own ranking but it is very flawed. It involves very old achievements that cannot be considered current. Looking at the ranking you provided is enough to make this obvious.

It's ranking of last 20 years, it's supposed to involve very old achievements

[amirb]

Hmm okay. I think that one main factor here is that every victory gives 20,000 points, regardless of the match. Probably I should lower this fixed value and hence have higher weight on the bonus points for the match importance. Not sure if this would make Serbia have a better score than Spain, but it wouldn't hurt to try and see how the two systems compare.

If the goal of your rankings is showing who the bet team is, then as you said both Serbia and Spain won and lost against the same teams in the top 4, so the other results should obviously distinguish between them. What are the bonus points you used?