Originally posted by nardy
View Post
From the other thread in reply to your comment you also posted there and this thread:
Yes it will make the competition more balanced and parity is to be expected. However, the Olympics would be less prestigious and that will go a long way in selling this particular Olympic product. i have zero argument that the NBA can still send a strong team composing of U23 players and even still be considered the favorite in future tournament but people will have to accept the fact that the luster will lose in such competitions (similar to Olympic football-- who really cares who comes out as champions there?).
Remember why the NBA is pushing for this, they want the FIBA Worlds to gain traction (not at the FIFA World Cup level obviously but it's a start) and they WANT to co-brand the Worlds-- meaning they want the profit with it as well. Can't blame them really because in the Olympics, it's the IOC who's making a killing with the gates, sponsors profit while the NBA is getting none-- really, do you want your investments to be used by others with nothing in return? People will argue: what about patriotism? Then tell that to the IOC; are they giving enough protection (say insurance) to those who participate? What about profit sharing? Is there enough to go around to s
Remember why the NBA is pushing for this, they want the FIBA Worlds to gain traction (not at the FIFA World Cup level obviously but it's a start) and they WANT to co-brand the Worlds-- meaning they want the profit with it as well. Can't blame them really because in the Olympics, it's the IOC who's making a killing with the gates, sponsors profit while the NBA is getting none-- really, do you want your investments to be used by others with nothing in return? People will argue: what about patriotism? Then tell that to the IOC; are they giving enough protection (say insurance) to those who participate? What about profit sharing? Is there enough to go around to s
Comment