Basketball at the Olympics should be U23. The WC should be the prime competition.

[Victorious]

The reason why basketball at the Olympics is considered the prime competition is probably due to the old rivalry between the USA and the Sovjet Union. The Olympics were used by the US and Sovjet governments as a tool too showcase their power. And when the US non-professional basketball teams started loosing gold medals during the Olympics, the Americans were out to prove something. So in 1992 they assembled arguably the best team ever in any sport. The USA Dream Team. This team became an example of excellence in any sport. That's because they were so much better than any other team. Due to this, many NBA players want to be part of the same team Jordan, Magic, Bird made world famous. So the best NBA players are usually keen in participating during the Olympics.
In a way though, this underrates the sport. A gold medal at the Olympics is worth as much as a gold for 3X3 basketball, water polo, or whatever sport. Prestige wise however, it is a great achievement to be the number one team in a team sport played by so many people all around the world. As such, basketball should have its own unique prime competition every four years. The World Cup basketball.

What are your thoughts on this?

[Dtown]

I imagine this is FIBA's end goal and what they would love to have happen, it's convincing everyone else of it though, primarily the United States, that's the problem. Because if you don't have an invested US you basically have Eurobasket + Argentina and Australia.

You mentioned the history of Olympic basketball, but it's the Olympics in general that are valued in the US, While an Olympic Gold in Basketball is worth as much as one in Water Polo, a gold medal, regardless of sport, is genuinely considered one of the highest sporting accomplishments you can have here. The World Cup on the other hand is mostly an unknown, it's definitely growing, but the attitude is just slightly better than the empty gyms that we saw in 2002.

Now is it possible to change it? Yes, but it's going to take time. The process is already starting, superstar MVP level players in the NBA from outside the US is becoming normal, and with that comes more desire to see national teams play each other. The Olympics have taken deserved hits for being a corrupt soulless organization, and this years Olympics are only making it worse. That said big stars need to commit to their teams for a World Cup, and FIBA needs to fix their god awful qualification methods to ensure those big stars have a chance to play.

If you can't do those last two things it will never pass the Olympics.

[Victorious]

I imagine this is FIBA's end goal and what they would love to have happen, it's convincing everyone else of it though, primarily the United States, that's the problem. Because if you don't have an invested US you basically have Eurobasket + Argentina and Australia.

You mentioned the history of Olympic basketball, but it's the Olympics in general that are valued in the US, While an Olympic Gold in Basketball is worth as much as one in Water Polo, a gold medal, regardless of sport, is genuinely considered one of the highest sporting accomplishments you can have here. The World Cup on the other hand is mostly an unknown, it's definitely growing, but the attitude is just slightly better than the empty gyms that we saw in 2002.

Now is it possible to change it? Yes, but it's going to take time. The process is already starting, superstar MVP level players in the NBA from outside the US is becoming normal, and with that comes more desire to see national teams play each other. The Olympics have taken deserved hits for being a corrupt soulless organization, and this years Olympics are only making it worse. That said big stars need to commit to their teams for a World Cup, and FIBA needs to fix their god awful qualification methods to ensure those big stars have a chance to play.

If you can't do those last two things it will never pass the Olympics.

I understand the American attitude about the value of a wold cup title in basketball. But we shouldn't forget that the US is just one country. The popularity of the game in the US will not suffer because of it either way, since they have the NBA. So we need to put the US on the side and prioritize the rest of the world here. For the rest of the world, winning the WC does matter a great deal.

If the US team is not invested, it means that other countries will have more chances in beating them. Think of the 3d tier USA team which they sent two years ago. It will not hurt the sport at all. It will essentially make it more interesting, since the world title will be up for grabs. And also, the world cup will be held once every four years, potentially in different countries. So there will be a lot of interest. If the US will loose one tournament, it will be a long time that they are not World Champions. The interest level will rise, even in the US.

On a global scale, just by eliminating basketball at the Olympics, the WC will surpass the value of the gold Olympic basketball medal overnight.

Now, we won't discard history altogether. Watching the U23 squads can be quite interesting and spectacular.

[JGX]

I don't think FIBA is interested. After London some NBA people were calling for the Olympics to be reduced to a U23 competition and one of the main reasons FIBA went to their new competition system was to reduce the workload on top players in order to ensure that the NBA would continue to allow them to play in the Olympics.

Not sure the IOC would go for it either. Soccer gets away with it because it still fills big stadiums and even then they had to allow some overage players.

It would be nice if FIBA had their own marquee competition with Olympic-level interest but I don't think the worldwide audience is there without the Olympic brand. You'd probably have to cut the WC down to a smaller tournament of elite teams with star players that people want to see.

[usagre]

Just to clear up a popular but false narrative that I hear all the time, the 1988 US collegiate loss to Soviets didn’t change the US mentality. They wanted to continue sending amateurs and voted against NBA players being allowed to participate. It was FIBA President Boris Stankovic that pushed for NBA players to be allowed.He did this for two main reasons. Firstly he realized that it would benefit the world if they competed against the best even if it meant severe beatings early on. Secondly he also realized that European players were improving and would be handicapped if they had to choose between playing in the best league in the world or representing their national teams. Oscar Schmidt is a good example of that.

[JamalJokic]

I imagine this is FIBA's end goal and what they would love to have happen, it's convincing everyone else of it though, primarily the United States, that's the problem. Because if you don't have an invested US you basically have Eurobasket + Argentina and Australia.

You mentioned the history of Olympic basketball, but it's the Olympics in general that are valued in the US, While an Olympic Gold in Basketball is worth as much as one in Water Polo, a gold medal, regardless of sport, is genuinely considered one of the highest sporting accomplishments you can have here. The World Cup on the other hand is mostly an unknown, it's definitely growing, but the attitude is just slightly better than the empty gyms that we saw in 2002.

Now is it possible to change it? Yes, but it's going to take time. The process is already starting, superstar MVP level players in the NBA from outside the US is becoming normal, and with that comes more desire to see national teams play each other. The Olympics have taken deserved hits for being a corrupt soulless organization, and this years Olympics are only making it worse. That said big stars need to commit to their teams for a World Cup, and FIBA needs to fix their god awful qualification methods to ensure those big stars have a chance to play.

If you can't do those last two things it will never pass the Olympics.

The biggest mistake FIBA made with changing the new WC qualification is the devaluing of the continental championships. Slovenia not making the WC but being the Euro champs made zero sense. Winners of the 4 four continental champs should automatically qualify for the WC.
I’m all for the Olympics changing to an u23 format. I think with the new WC timeline it takes a lot to ask the senior team players to commit to back to back summer tournaments. Especially with the pressure from the nba and Euroleague on the players to skip these tournaments.

[Nemanja95]

My opinion will not be Olympics basketball u23.

Best Olympic basketball tournament what I watched, it was 2012. Next tournament 2016 was much weaker than last in order to this tournament playing in last week of July and first week August, on half of period between two seasons.

Result of that is basketball without strategy, tactic, with extremely individual play, with week defense due physical unpreparedness of players and lack of time. Almost, without surprise and without creation and with very predictable play. Actually, extensive version of Nba . I don`t like this and appreciate little .

[Steadysoul]

I don't think FIBA is interested. After London some NBA people were calling for the Olympics to be reduced to a U23 competition and one of the main reasons FIBA went to their new competition system was to reduce the workload on top players in order to ensure that the NBA would continue to allow them to play in the Olympics.

Not sure the IOC would go for it either. Soccer gets away with it because it still fills big stadiums and even then they had to allow some overage players.

It would be nice if FIBA had their own marquee competition with Olympic-level interest but I don't think the worldwide audience is there without the Olympic brand. You'd probably have to cut the WC down to a smaller tournament of elite teams with star players that people want to see.

FIFA also had a way more complicated set up before switching to u23.

[Steadysoul]

The biggest mistake FIBA made with changing the new WC qualification is the devaluing of the continental championships. Slovenia not making the WC but being the Euro champs made zero sense. Winners of the 4 four continental champs should automatically qualify for the WC.
I’m all for the Olympics changing to an u23 format. I think with the new WC timeline it takes a lot to ask the senior team players to commit to back to back summer tournaments. Especially with the pressure from the nba and Euroleague on the players to skip these tournaments.

They could have simply made the schedule

break
zone
wc
olympics
rinse and repeat.

That would have had the same effect.

[Giannis34GOD]

The biggest mistake FIBA made with changing the new WC qualification is the devaluing of the continental championships. Slovenia not making the WC but being the Euro champs made zero sense. Winners of the 4 four continental champs should automatically qualify for the WC.
I’m all for the Olympics changing to an u23 format. I think with the new WC timeline it takes a lot to ask the senior team players to commit to back to back summer tournaments. Especially with the pressure from the nba and Euroleague on the players to skip these tournaments.

I don't think so... Look at the viewers of 2019 than 2014 and before?

This is 2014 FIBA WC viewers

https://www.fiba.basketball/basketballworldcup/2014/news/PR-N-51-Spain-2014-Group-Phase-games-register-stron

This is 2019 FIBA WC viewers

https://www.fiba.basketball/news/biggest-ever-fiba-world-cup-reaches-record-breaking-three-billion-people

It was triple or more than the previous one... Whatever we said about these WC... basketball already gaining fans every single WC event... And with 50K staduim in the Philippines in 2023, The viewers will be more bigger than before....

[jamesalan]

I appreciate the historical context you've provided about basketball at the Olympics and the emergence of the 1992 USA Dream Team, which indeed set a high bar for excellence. It's fascinating to consider how political rivalries and a quest for superiority bolstered the sport's prestige at the Olympics. However, I do agree that basketball deserves its unique prime competition distinct from the Olympics, much like football has the World Cup. Restricting the Olympics to U23 would allow new talent to shine on a global stage, while the World Cup could become the ultimate showdown of the best in the sport. It's an interesting proposal that would definitely reshape international basketball dynamics and prestige.

[Alfric653]

The prominence of basketball in the Olympics traces back to the intense rivalry between the USA and the Soviet Union, which used the Games as a platform to display their power. As the US amateur basketball teams faced losses in Olympic gold medals, there was a determination to prove something significant. In response, the 1992 Dream Team emerged, often regarded as the pinnacle of sporting excellence, showcasing an unprecedented level of skill. This elevated basketball's appeal, drawing top NBA players eager to join a team that reached global fame through icons like Jordan, Magic, and Bird.

[lewiswood]

Honestly speaking, your thoughts are close to me because I also like sports. I also need your advice right now, do you know any reliable casino? I was just trying to find something for myself, I found https://1xbets.com.ph/application/ , so what do you think about that? I would like your opinion now.

[Sarika539]

The idea of implementing an age restriction for basketball at the Olympics, such as the Under-23 (U23) rule, is an interesting proposal and has been discussed in various sports. It would align with the approach taken in football (soccer), where the Olympic tournament is restricted to players under 23 years old with a few overage exceptions.

Advocates argue that such a rule could make the Olympic basketball competition more focused on developing young talent, providing a platform for emerging players to showcase their skills on a global stage. This could potentially enhance the competitive balance of the tournament and create a unique dynamic compared to other major basketball competitions.

However, there are also counterarguments. The Olympics are traditionally considered the pinnacle of sports, and some may argue that restricting the age group for basketball could diminish the overall quality of the competition, as it would exclude some of the best players in the world who are over 23.

The FIBA Basketball World Cup, on the other hand, is already a premier international basketball competition. It serves as a global showcase for top basketball talent, regardless of age restrictions. Both the Olympics and the World Cup have their own significance in the basketball world, and opinions may vary on whether one should take precedence over the other.

Ultimately, any proposed changes to the age eligibility in Olympic basketball would likely involve discussions among basketball governing bodies, athletes, and other stakeholders to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. It's essential to consider the impact on the athletes, the quality of competition, and the overall objectives of international basketball events.https://topfollowapks.com/

[sterycop]

I don't think FIBA is interested. After London some NBA people were calling for the Olympics to be reduced to a U23 competition and one of the main reasons FIBA went to their new competition system was to reduce the workload on top players in order to ensure that the NBA would continue to allow them to play in the Olympics.
krnl.fun
hdstreamz apk