Originally posted by Dreamcatcher
View Post
What I'm saying that we overlook few things, like:
- Other players aside 2 stars are not as good as it potentially looked in U16. Guys like Laurencikas, Smirnov looked dynamic at this stage. Now they just disappear almost.
- The team lacked Buika. He could help a lot with additional creativity.
My point is, that it's funny to drop the weight on Jakucionis when he drops 37pts (efficient) and say that, look, he couldn't even bring this team to U19 WC while Grigonises and such could, LOL. Yeah, like Jakucionis had to drop 50pts that he would prove he's as good as Grigonis The guy who probably scored 24pts as his career high in Youth level and averaged 12,3ppg as his career high.
My point is very simple, Jakucionis and Indrusaitis played well, but supporting cast was really bad this time. Also the team wasn't well coached. And potentially we are talking about one of the most competitive U18 ever. These things overlooked by primitive redneck posters here as SS, who would make ridiculous even idiotic reductions Like, of no U19, so Jakucionis and Indrusaitis aren't even as good as Grigonis and Dimsa, LOL. I have no time for idiots like that.
There's really tons of potential lottery picks in this tournament. Not sure if Safar is one of them, but even he could be. As well as Traore and Gonzalez are nearly locks, and Jakucionis is very often mentioned as lottery as well. There's no way there's so many guards as potential lottery in the draft. This gen is stacked. I also exclude tons of other great guards as Drezgic, who looked amazing, but lacking X factor, German guards and so on. To overlook that this U18 was one of the most stacked ever is also big mistake.
It's a failure team wise, but I personally not disappointed cause to me the most important thing - the development of Jakucionis and Indrusaitis. I want senior NT to be legit again and those 2 are super important.
Comment