I believe it's a controversy between Marčiulionis and Sabonis. I don't really like the dendency (will it be denied or approved here?) to rank Sabonis as a sure case all time greatest Lithuanian player. I think there should be a discussion.
We have to agree that titles should not be the only judge here while it would be an easy win by Sabonis. I think we know the reasons why Sabonis has so many European basketball related awards and Marčiulionis has not. Simply one was playing in Europe, other in NBA. Let's look at international carreer than:
- Marčiulionis is a bigger scorer (19,7 ppg) than Sabonis (18, 9 ppg) in the Lithuanian NT.
- Marčiulionis lead Soviet Union to the gold as a star in 1988 Olympics and not Sabonis. NBA commentators talked about Marčiulionis as "a baller" who is ready to play NBA and not Sabonis in this tournament (underating Sabonis, but it's not the point). Marčiulionis was averaging 18 ppg, while Sabonis 13 ppg.
- Marčiulionis was MVP of Eurobasket 1995 and Sabonis never was (?). That was second best record of Eurobasket's history of Lithuanian NT.
NBA career:
- 18,9 ppg as best season in NBA for Marčiulionis. 16 ppg for Sabonis.
- He was the runner-up for the NBA’s Sixth Man of the Year Award for the 1991-92 season in which he averaged 18.9 points and 3.4 assists while shooting 53.8 percent from the field.
- Sabonis was closer to win in all in NBA (championship), but Marčiulionis had 2 great NBA seasons with Worriors being an elite guard in NBA.
So as I see things, Marčiulionis while being at his peak was a superior player than Sabonis. One would say Sabonis had bigger impact with his all round game, but I saw Marčiulionis as a guy to go in 1988 and basically in all other tournaments with Lithianian NT till 1996 where Marčiulionis' career started to fall. The guy could take the ball in his hands and to get to the basket any time he wanted, he spread the defence when the team struggled, he was a motor rather than Sabonis.
Marčiulionis had more impressive individual NBA carreer even though people speculate that Sabonis could be better if ended up in NBA sooner (international carreer doesn't show that though). I think it's more about Sabonis' injuries controversy.
So I have an impression that Sabonis had longer career which was filled with different titles and awards while Marčiulionis had shorter, but more explosive carreer. In other words, Sabonis accomplished so much more, but if we would talk only about peaking Marčiulionis and Sabonis - I would go with Marčiulionis.
Yet, Sabonis is a hall of famer while Marčiulions barely will be. So, I have a feeling Marčiulionis is a little bit underrated and around Sabonis was build a lot of misticism and legends (speculation about how fantastic pre-injury Sabonis would be in NBA). Sure thing Sabonis deserves that, but it might be a little exaggeration. What if Sabonis wouldn't be better without these injuries? Maybe he wouldn't have these skills he had while being one step slower. I mean, Sabonis always had this "if" when we talk about his greatness and that "if" comes as a credit to his career, I'm not in love with that. It's the same as to judge Valančiūnas as the next Robert Parish/Hakeem Olajuwon while watching his performance like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCMXxQGhGzQ) and than when he'll fail to reach this to argement "there was reasons why he couldn't become so big while potential obviously was here".
For me there's no obvious answer, but I have a sure feeling, despite Sabonis being a phenominal player, Marčiulionis was the guy when both were young and 100% healthy.
We have to agree that titles should not be the only judge here while it would be an easy win by Sabonis. I think we know the reasons why Sabonis has so many European basketball related awards and Marčiulionis has not. Simply one was playing in Europe, other in NBA. Let's look at international carreer than:
- Marčiulionis is a bigger scorer (19,7 ppg) than Sabonis (18, 9 ppg) in the Lithuanian NT.
- Marčiulionis lead Soviet Union to the gold as a star in 1988 Olympics and not Sabonis. NBA commentators talked about Marčiulionis as "a baller" who is ready to play NBA and not Sabonis in this tournament (underating Sabonis, but it's not the point). Marčiulionis was averaging 18 ppg, while Sabonis 13 ppg.
- Marčiulionis was MVP of Eurobasket 1995 and Sabonis never was (?). That was second best record of Eurobasket's history of Lithuanian NT.
NBA career:
- 18,9 ppg as best season in NBA for Marčiulionis. 16 ppg for Sabonis.
- He was the runner-up for the NBA’s Sixth Man of the Year Award for the 1991-92 season in which he averaged 18.9 points and 3.4 assists while shooting 53.8 percent from the field.
- Sabonis was closer to win in all in NBA (championship), but Marčiulionis had 2 great NBA seasons with Worriors being an elite guard in NBA.
So as I see things, Marčiulionis while being at his peak was a superior player than Sabonis. One would say Sabonis had bigger impact with his all round game, but I saw Marčiulionis as a guy to go in 1988 and basically in all other tournaments with Lithianian NT till 1996 where Marčiulionis' career started to fall. The guy could take the ball in his hands and to get to the basket any time he wanted, he spread the defence when the team struggled, he was a motor rather than Sabonis.
Marčiulionis had more impressive individual NBA carreer even though people speculate that Sabonis could be better if ended up in NBA sooner (international carreer doesn't show that though). I think it's more about Sabonis' injuries controversy.
So I have an impression that Sabonis had longer career which was filled with different titles and awards while Marčiulionis had shorter, but more explosive carreer. In other words, Sabonis accomplished so much more, but if we would talk only about peaking Marčiulionis and Sabonis - I would go with Marčiulionis.
Yet, Sabonis is a hall of famer while Marčiulions barely will be. So, I have a feeling Marčiulionis is a little bit underrated and around Sabonis was build a lot of misticism and legends (speculation about how fantastic pre-injury Sabonis would be in NBA). Sure thing Sabonis deserves that, but it might be a little exaggeration. What if Sabonis wouldn't be better without these injuries? Maybe he wouldn't have these skills he had while being one step slower. I mean, Sabonis always had this "if" when we talk about his greatness and that "if" comes as a credit to his career, I'm not in love with that. It's the same as to judge Valančiūnas as the next Robert Parish/Hakeem Olajuwon while watching his performance like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCMXxQGhGzQ) and than when he'll fail to reach this to argement "there was reasons why he couldn't become so big while potential obviously was here".
For me there's no obvious answer, but I have a sure feeling, despite Sabonis being a phenominal player, Marčiulionis was the guy when both were young and 100% healthy.
Comment