Originally posted by IPC
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Future Big Men Of Philippine Basketball
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by interxavierxxx View PostYour opinions on Geo Chiu? Do you see him as purely a low-post player (like Junemar) or more than that?
Under Ateneo, I see Geo being a stretch-5 who is strong on the low post but can also hit jumpers/3s like Aron Baynes.
Chiu’s physique is fit for this as he is not easily pushed by other international bigs. Just needs improvement on his low post moves and shooting touch.
Baynes with a post skillset seems reasonable. Hopefully he develops that post game and shooting. Defense is there, e.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hmbopbaduwap View PostAccording to the article Shinshu management is willing to invest on his development thus, the 3 year contract, so yeah expect Matt to sit a lot this year as he is a project for Shinshu
https://tiebreakertimes.com.ph/tbt/m...arriors/221798
Shinshu, which was promoted to B1 two years ago, is willing to invest in Aquino’s development.
And the only way Aquino will repay the trust given to him is by improving every day.
“Dun kami nagulat dun sa three-year offer,” he said. “Right now, the goal is to improve every day and take it step-by-step. I just want to improve myself and madami pa ako kailangang patunayan, hindi lang sa iba, kung hindi sa sarili ko.Originally posted by IPC View PostI hope Shinshu really invests in his development. We might have a potential big in our hands if he develops and improves.Originally posted by noyce View PostIt could actually be the other way around, maybe Japan will enlist Matthew Aquino to their NT if he marks tremendous improvement (it's their league developing him after all). A poster mentioned that he could be another Atsuya Ota, an NT mainstay and insurance big. That's his ceiling right now, especially with Japan's main bigs, Rui and Watanabe, only available in major tournaments.Originally posted by Jackie Reaper View PostIt's fine for me if he decides to represent Japan NT since he is not really considered to play for Gilas. You know, Gilas, despite being a "short" team, is not really that short.
Just look at the depth of bigmen:
Sotto
Kouame
Edu
Chiu
Go
Rangel
Baltazar
Tamayo
Erram
Almazan
Ong
Cariño
This list pertains only to the MVP and Gilas staple. I'm not including those in the SMC and other groups. In comparison, Japan, outside Hachimura, Watanabe, Hoghland, Schafer and Edwards/Rossiter, does not have much bigs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IPC View PostThe kid fights inside. He just needs to develop strength, which is possible kasi bata pa siya.
Baynes with a post skillset seems reasonable. Hopefully he develops that post game and shooting. Defense is there, e.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PeeZones View PostYou only need skilled and high IQ bigs and they will know what to do. Those you mention were all very skilled and high IQ. What is ailing LA is that most players arent really great with bball IQ. they look lost and out of touch. You could trade athleticism over IQ anytime. What is the use of athleticism if you dont know what to do?lol LA without lebron is like running headless.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IPC View PostYou might still need a little athleticism for defense, though I still think defense is more about anticipation and effort than athletic gifts. However, athletic gifts matter a little more when you're playing in the forward and center positions, but as for PF and C, height matters, well if you're traditionally-minded.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IPC View PostAt least we're not shallow in terms of 6'7"+ bigs. The only thing we have to do now is train them to play both bigman positions, meaing playing the 4 as well as the 5. Hopefully the number in this lists increase as well.
Meeting the minimum baseline to be a stretch 4/5 is good.
Small Forward? That's even better.GILAS WISHLIST:
6'8 Pingris
Comment
-
Originally posted by DAdmiral View PostMaybe I'm just a bad coach, I have a 6' 9 big in my Uni team , who can shoot 3's at low %, at the end my most effective lineup was using a 6' 6 forward a center with a versatile strong 6' 3 player at 4. and with 3 guard. that's what worked for me .
As a coach,
do you force your player to fit in your system?
or you adjust your system based on your player's strengths and playstyle?
Comment
-
Id rather have the 6'6 guy who plays big and very capable than a raw 6'9 although its a "great" thing if the 6'6 guy can play 3 and 4 and the 6'9 guy can play beside him and produce good results(it becomes the duty now of the 6'6 quality guy to make te 6'9 guy look good or decent..
If youre a Johnedel cardel(err bad example) or a Pido jarencio you will look bad on some average fans but you will push the 6'9 player and give him chance(pero alam namn natin na farm teams yun binigay kong example).. while a Tim Cone or Jong uichico type of coach will bench you.. if the 6'4 guy is the most capable big you have I will use it with my 4 guards(jong)To becomes Asia's Best, we need to compete against the World's Best..
1 Big 4 small > 5 out offense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by reamily View PostId rather have the 6'6 guy who plays big and very capable than a raw 6'9 although its a "great" thing if the 6'6 guy can play 3 and 4 and the 6'9 guy can play beside him and produce good results(it becomes the duty now of the 6'6 quality guy to make te 6'9 guy look good or decent..
If youre a Johnedel cardel(err bad example) or a Pido jarencio you will look bad on some average fans but you will push the 6'9 player and give him chance(pero alam namn natin na farm teams yun binigay kong example).. while a Tim Cone or Jong uichico type of coach will bench you.. if the 6'4 guy is the most capable big you have I will use it with my 4 guards(jong)
Developing a raw 6'9 or taller player come with a risk of losing some games.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathematicianrcg View PostIf our main goal is winning. Yeah, u always go with the more polished and talented player.
Developing a raw 6'9 or taller player come with a risk of losing some games.To becomes Asia's Best, we need to compete against the World's Best..
1 Big 4 small > 5 out offense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by reamily View PostId rather have the 6'6 guy who plays big and very capable than a raw 6'9 although its a "great" thing if the 6'6 guy can play 3 and 4 and the 6'9 guy can play beside him and produce good results(it becomes the duty now of the 6'6 quality guy to make te 6'9 guy look good or decent..
If youre a Johnedel cardel(err bad example) or a Pido jarencio you will look bad on some average fans but you will push the 6'9 player and give him chance(pero alam namn natin na farm teams yun binigay kong example).. while a Tim Cone or Jong uichico type of coach will bench you.. if the 6'4 guy is the most capable big you have I will use it with my 4 guards(jong)
If you wanna win, use the best bigs, no matter how big or small. If you want to develop for Gilas, develop your tallest players to play smaller positions, if that tall player is 6'8" below.
This is why my philosophy is small-ball for development (unless you have a 6'7"+ PF and a 6'9"+ center), then you can use traditional ball once you get a few years into the pro or Gilas senior level, kas almost done na development ng players, e.
Comment
-
Originally posted by reamily View Postok lang namn yan eh, what's difficult is losing a job for a coach..kung high school coach (pe teacher) baka pwede ngang you become a teacher of the game and apply seniority to your players
Comment
-
Originally posted by thatweirdguy View PostWell if I were to choose between isaac Holstein or Justin Chua playing C I'd definitely choose a guy whos 5 inch shorter. A lot of these stiffs really just happen to be tall without any knack for playing ball..
Comment
-
Guys, do our collegiate & high school big men in the local scene still being taught of low post skills or back-to-the-basket moves? If so, how extensive (or maybe the lack of it) are they taught & train aspects like footwork, pivot & spin moves?
I feel low post or back-to-the-basket moves have become a dying skill among our big men. I remember during the 90's we had the likes of Patrimonio (for me the most skilled low post player in the PBA of all time), Benjie Paras, Jun Limpot, Bong Hawkins, Dennis Espino, Marlou Aquino, as among the PBA's most skilled post up players. Grabe ang footwork & pivot skills ng mga players na yun.
For now, parang kunting kunti na lang ang mga bigs sa PBA who have pretty decent low post moves. Parang sina Junmar at Greg Slaughter nalang ang talagang may desenting post up game.
The game today may have become so different from what it was during the 90's but I think malaking bagay pa rin ang low post game in today's game. I know the game today has become a run & gun type of game with more emphasis on 3-pt shooting but the problem is, yung 3-pt shooting or outside shooting are the most inconsistent offense in the game. Hindi mo pweding asahan lagi ang outside shooting kasi may prone to off nights ang mga shooters. On the other hand, mas consistent talaga ang inside or low post game."A king may move a man, a father may claim a son, but that man can also move himself, and only then does that man truly begin his own game. Remember that howsoever you are played or by whom, your soul is in your keeping alone, even though those who presume to play you be kings or men of power, when you stand before God, you cannot say, 'But I was told by others to do thus,' or that virtue was not convenient at the time. This will not suffice." - King Baldwin IV
Comment
Comment