Tweet
PBA mistook the circus for innovation.
All these are OK for the All Star game but not the regular games. Looking forward to a FIBA ban.
All these are OK for the All Star game but not the regular games. Looking forward to a FIBA ban.
-
-
The reason why teams tend to camp at the paint/play zone defense is because pba players are not known for their 3 point shooting, the 4 point shot would just lead to comical shots especially during crunch time and teams are trying to catch up a big lead.
Well atleast pogoy, oftana et al are decent shooters in the pbaComment
-
Cmon I dont like it but a FIBA ban is for clowns.Originally posted by greenarcher View PostComment
-
Yeah Filipino players are not good 3 point shooters, this just aint a PBA thing. For some reason we dont really develop them well.Originally posted by CoJ View PostComment
-
An MBA innovation by then Chief Operating Officer Chot Reyes, might as well bring back the free three. HeheOriginally posted by ja.he View Post
Comment
-
The MBA did invent the 8-second backcourt rule. It is now used in FIBA.Comment
-
And they are also one of the first pro leagues to adapt the possession arrow.Originally posted by deku_midoriya View PostComment
-
Bring back the blitz three and the three point free throwComment
-
-
But the eight-second violation makes alot of sense.Originally posted by deku_midoriya View PostAttack
defend
UniteComment
-
with the backlash i think it will not push throughComment
-
I hope you are right but did the PBA even care about the backlash though? The backlash issue on farm teams have been going on for years and they don't even talk about it.Originally posted by JOI2dWorld View PostComment
-
they do except about this thing, remember before they had the draft dodger rule but removed it due to the backlash from fans, the same with the draft lottery when Chito Salud did not remove his hand inside the draw box the caused controversy regarding the legitimacy of the lotteryOriginally posted by lem0nadi View PostComment
-
The PBA has their non-negotiables. Like the import height limit and farm teams.
The rest are open for discussion. Bunch of retards.Comment
-
It makes sense now but it was a radical idea before like the three point line and shot clock in the early days.Originally posted by ja.he View Post
The PBA will do this to stay relevant, but perhaps these rules or similar radical rules will also get adopted by FIBA and the NBA as the game evolves.
The PBA had a longer 3 point line in the 90s, longer than FIBA but shorter than the NBA. FIBA then adopted a longer line equivalent to the PBA line.
The PBA and NBA had 4 quarters before FIBA adopted it.
Comment
Comment