Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PBA 49th Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    and see the PBA Board bring back the draft lottery

    Comment


    • #62
      Ex ABL teams HK Eastern and Singapore Slingers interested in PBA stint. This is one way to modernize and draw interest for the league, absorb those abl teams and expand in the region.


      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by CoJ View Post
        Ex ABL teams HK Eastern and Singapore Slingers interested in PBA stint. This is one way to modernize and draw interest for the league, absorb those abl teams and expand in the region.


        https://www.spin.ph/basketball/pba/h...kbPyJ5-_B3qi2g
        Accept 2 Guest team and make a 2 groups of 7 and make it double round robin. 6 games home and away for Singapore and Hongkong.
        ""failure is not the end but just the beginning of a victorious journey..just keep on dreaming and we will be back on the olympics''''

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by CoJ View Post
          Ex ABL teams HK Eastern and Singapore Slingers interested in PBA stint. This is one way to modernize and draw interest for the league, absorb those abl teams and expand in the region.


          https://<a href="https://www.spin.ph...J5-_B3qi2g</a>
          Hi-Tech Bangkok and the Saigon Heat should be the next teams they should pursue.

          Comment


          • #65
            "Under the initial proposal, HK Eastern is to play six home games at the new Kai Tak Sports Park and six road games in Manila during the eliminations. If it qualifies for the playoffs, a home-and-away format may also be applied."

            After the success of the Bay Area Dragons’ stint in 2022, Asia’s first play-for-pay league is working on the possible participation of the HK Eastern quintet in the tournament.


            Is this a dry run for a home-and-away format in the PBA?
            Attack
            defend
            Unite

            Comment


            • #67
              Bakits posted a video on how Balti can be effective now in the PBA and the things he needs to develop to be more effective. Let’s face it the PBA is not kind to 6’7 lanky guys who play from the perimeter. However, these are the type of guys we need for Fiba. 6’6 Arana type players are useless in Fiba. We dont develop 6’6 and up players who can somewhat defend the perimeter. Heck, 6’6 Lucero bulked up and played center for NP.

              That’s not what we need. We need our eligible 6’6 to 6’8 guys be mobile enough to guard the perimeter in Fiba and not bulked up to play the post.

              Balti might not be as smooth defending the perimeter as Norwood and even Navarro. But he is taller (6’6 3/4) and longer. He showed in Fiba that he is a good switch defender. His defense was one of the reasons we won 2x against Hyun Jun led Korea. Him improving his perimeter play and being effective in the PBA means less pressure to bulk up and slow down. Meaning being more ready for Fiba.

              Comment


              • #68
                Is this good or bad?

                IMG_1699.jpg

                Comment


                • #69
                  Originally posted by CoJ View Post
                  Is this good or bad?

                  IMG_1699.jpg
                  it's bad, FIBA has no four-point line. Even NBA has no four-point line. The implementation of this line might encourage the players to do bad shots. Anything beyond 23 feet is a bad shot unless you are Curry or just doing a hail mary in the dying seconds of the game.
                  Attack
                  defend
                  Unite

                  Comment


                  • #70
                    Originally posted by ja.he View Post

                    it's bad, FIBA has no four-point line. Even NBA has no four-point line. The implementation of this line might encourage the players to do bad shots. Anything beyond 23 feet is a bad shot unless you are Curry or just doing a hail mary in the dying seconds of the game.
                    This is straight out of north korea’s playbook. Gonna be painful to watch players jack 4 point shots (bolick ,lee ehem)

                    should have kept this in the all star game

                    Comment


                    • #71
                      Originally posted by Rds View Post
                      Bakits posted a video on how Balti can be effective now in the PBA and the things he needs to develop to be more effective. Let’s face it the PBA is not kind to 6’7 lanky guys who play from the perimeter. However, these are the type of guys we need for Fiba. 6’6 Arana type players are useless in Fiba. We dont develop 6’6 and up players who can somewhat defend the perimeter. Heck, 6’6 Lucero bulked up and played center for NP.

                      That’s not what we need. We need our eligible 6’6 to 6’8 guys be mobile enough to guard the perimeter in Fiba and not bulked up to play the post.

                      Balti might not be as smooth defending the perimeter as Norwood and even Navarro. But he is taller (6’6 3/4) and longer. He showed in Fiba that he is a good switch defender. His defense was one of the reasons we won 2x against Hyun Jun led Korea. Him improving his perimeter play and being effective in the PBA means less pressure to bulk up and slow down. Meaning being more ready for Fiba.
                      Is this, Bakits, a legit game analyst?

                      Comment


                      • #72
                        Originally posted by CoJ View Post

                        This is straight out of north korea’s playbook. Gonna be painful to watch players jack 4 point shots (bolick ,lee ehem)

                        should have kept this in the all star game
                        They are not addressing atleast one of the problems that the PBA has been facing in terms of gate attendance.

                        Even if the PBA makes a dunk three points, the problem will not be addressed because that four point shot or the three point dunk have nothing to do with the problem.
                        Attack
                        defend
                        Unite

                        Comment


                        • #73
                          Weird, we’re implementing a 4 pt shot yet pba teams are notorious for poor shooting

                          Comment


                          • #74
                            Originally posted by ja.he View Post

                            They are not addressing atleast one of the problems that the PBA has been facing in terms of gate attendance.

                            Even if the PBA makes a dunk three points, the problem will not be addressed because that four point shot or the three point dunk have not nothing to do with the problem.
                            Just copy the jones cup model, cheerleaders in skimpy outfits (plus beer)

                            Comment


                            • #75
                              Originally posted by ja.he View Post

                              it's bad, FIBA has no four-point line. Even NBA has no four-point line. The implementation of this line might encourage the players to do bad shots. Anything beyond 23 feet is a bad shot unless you are Curry or just doing a hail mary in the dying seconds of the game.
                              it's stupid. the game is global, and everyone is waiting for the rules to merge, such as if 10 or 12 minute quarters, basket interference, zone defense, etc. PBA becomes a circus with a 4-pt shot.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X

                              Debug Information