Originally posted by gospursgo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UAAP season 87
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sikatrix View Post
Yeah this probably hurts the players who arent stars more. Alao is gonna be affected by this I think and right now it looks like he is gonna need all those playing years.
Alao and Demisana - 3 years left
Competente and Amos - 2 years left
Ironically, 2 of the 3 schools of these players, Adamson and FEU, arent really 'big' schools lol haha. UP and most of DLSU's tranferees made the smart move of transferring early
Comment
-
Regarding the new UAAP transfer and eligibility rule, can anyone confirm if this is how it works:
Example:
Year 1: Player X plays for School A
Year 2: Player X decides to transfer to School B and sits out (one year residency). In the process, loses 2 eligible playing years due to the new rule.
Year 3 and 4: Player X plays for School B for at most just 2 years.
Does the sit out on Year 2 count against the eligible playing years?
Comment
-
Originally posted by maroonforlife View PostRegarding the new UAAP transfer and eligibility rule, can anyone confirm if this is how it works:
Example:
Year 1: Player X plays for School A
Year 2: Player X decides to transfer to School B and sits out (one year residency). In the process, loses 2 eligible playing years due to the new rule.
Year 3 and 4: Player X plays for School B for at most just 2 years.
Does the sit out on Year 2 count against the eligible playing years?
College Year 1 (Season 86) - Plays for Ateneo (first playing year)
College Year 2 (S87) - Residency year while enrolled in DLSU
College Year 3 (S88) - Plays for DLSU (second playing year)
College Year 4 (S89) - Plays for DLSU (third playing year)
Under the previous rule, Amos would have been eligible to pay until S90.
The easier way to look at it is that the sit-out year, counts as two playing years. Under the previous rule, it counted as only one playing year.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by gospursgo View Post
If im not mistaken, those affected are Alao, Demisana, Competente and Amos.
Alao and Demisana - 3 years left
Competente and Amos - 2 years left
Ironically, 2 of the 3 schools of these players, Adamson and FEU, arent really 'big' schools lol haha. UP and most of DLSU's tranferees made the smart move of transferring early
Comment
-
Originally posted by gospursgo View Post
If im not mistaken, those affected are Alao, Demisana, Competente and Amos.
Alao and Demisana - 3 years left
Competente and Amos - 2 years left
Ironically, 2 of the 3 schools of these players, Adamson and FEU, arent really 'big' schools lol haha. UP and most of DLSU's tranferees made the smart move of transferring early
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money View Post
I think we have to look at when the UAAP held its closing ceremonies (if before then those players werent affected by this rule, if after then they will most likely be affected).This was also confirmed by Naveen during one of his livestreams.
Comment
-
DLSU is on a tri-mester curriculum. According to their calendar first term is September to August. Mason announced his move to transfer late June which is in the middle of the third term. So technically he is covered by this new rule. Unless DLSU made accommodations to enroll him late for the second term and avoids the new rule.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Crustacean View Post
Yes this is how it works. Let's use Amos as example assuming he plays the maximum allowed years:
College Year 1 (Season 86) - Plays for Ateneo (first playing year)
College Year 2 (S87) - Residency year while enrolled in DLSU
College Year 3 (S88) - Plays for DLSU (second playing year)
College Year 4 (S89) - Plays for DLSU (third playing year)
Under the previous rule, Amos would have been eligible to pay until S90.
The easier way to look at it is that the sit-out year, counts as two playing years. Under the previous rule, it counted as only one playing year.
Imma give an example; lets look at 3rd year guard form UST Ivanne Calum. He has been linedup since 85 but was sparingly used the last 2 years, and more than likely this year as well being tge 3rd string pg after padrigao and paranada, if he decides to look for better opportunities, he has no choice but to move to a non uaap school.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Big_Cat View PostDLSU is on a tri-mester curriculum. According to their calendar first term is September to August. Mason announced his move to transfer late June which is in the middle of the third term. So technically he is covered by this new rule. Unless DLSU made accommodations to enroll him late for the second term and avoids the new rule.
Comment
-
Players planning to move from one UAAP school to another would have more thoughts to consider, after the league announced another playing year would be deducted for transferees.
“The offseason saw several players like Luis Pablo, Kean Baclaan, and recently Mason Amos jump to reigning champion DLSU Green Archers.
But Pablo and Baclaan will not be affected by the rule alongside UP’s Rey Remogat and Gani Stevens, and UST’s Kyle Paranada.
However, those who transferred after the 2023-24 academic year will be affected. Those includesAmos, Renzo Competente from FEU to UST, Mur Alao from DLSU to UE, and Kobe Demisana who transferred from Ateneo to Adamson.”
Comment
-
I look at it in three ways.
For the stars (for recent examples, think of Tamayo and KQ), it probably won't affect them, specially if they do decide to transfer early. There is a good chance pro offers (local or overseas) comes early, so I doubt they plan to play out all five (5) years anyway. So if they want to transfer early and just play two more years instead of three, losing that one extra year might not matter (both for the player and team).
For the late bloomers, say they have their breakout year by their 2nd year or 3rd year, this rule might actually work. Think of Remogat. Under the new rule, he'd be a one and done for UP instead of having two years. It'll not prevent such transfers 100%, but it'll deter its fair share.
For those stuck on the bench, this would suck. Either they continue with the current team, or go to NCAA. As mentioned already, Seven would be a great example. He could potentially may have a lane with UP given 4 more years of eligibility, or with an NCAA team (3 years?), though I doubt he goes to another UAAP team.
It'll have some effect to an extent, but I doubt to the extent that the UAAP supposedly intends to.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment