After reading FiBA rules and not basing it on Philippine law (which is a seperate discussion)
You can see why as host of the 2023 World Cup and assuming Kouame has a Philippine passport, if the SBP requested for an exemption for both Clarkson and Kouame with one of them to remain as designated naturalize player, FIBA would grant Kouame's request and keep Clarkson as a naturalize player. Fiba officials will have justification for such decision as seen in its rules if questioned by rival Asian teams competing for the one Olympic spot. No way can they justify Clarkson getting an exception.
I've already discussed and showed the financial merits of why Kouame and Clarkson for 2023
Hopefully with all of this one can now see the rational for the blueprint
You can see why as host of the 2023 World Cup and assuming Kouame has a Philippine passport, if the SBP requested for an exemption for both Clarkson and Kouame with one of them to remain as designated naturalize player, FIBA would grant Kouame's request and keep Clarkson as a naturalize player. Fiba officials will have justification for such decision as seen in its rules if questioned by rival Asian teams competing for the one Olympic spot. No way can they justify Clarkson getting an exception.
I've already discussed and showed the financial merits of why Kouame and Clarkson for 2023
Hopefully with all of this one can now see the rational for the blueprint
Comment