Originally posted by mohsena2631
View Post
I also know from reading the other FIBA zones' threads about their men's and women's continental championships this year that it is happening more and more often with other national teams in other zones, but I think that FIBA must limit this practice because it is apiraling out of control and messing up the competitions so the results are skewed and not valid and fair.
I also know from reading other threads on other FIBA zones' respective message boards on other countries' national teams aboutv their preparations for the coming 2010 FIBA World Championships in Turkey, and reading about how many countries are importing players who although they have ancestry from that country were born and grew up in another country, that one day I fear that the FIBA basketball competitions will not be about which country produces better basketball players and which country is better at basketball in truth, with its own players born and raised there, but more about which countries basketball federation was smarter and had better strategies to recruit better import and naturalized players.
The FIBA players' ancestry rule is destroying the FIBA basketball competitions and it is only getting worse as this is happening more and more in every FIBA zone and being done by more and more countries and is corrupting the competition system.
I guess with such massive cheating going on, which, although it is allowed, and doesn't violate the Letter of the Law, and FIBA rules regarding this matter, but violates the Spirit of the Law--the spirit of uprightness, fair play, and fair competion, then in the end, thst most countries around the world will follow the importation of foreign players and each naturalize a player within several decades, so that whoever wins the competitions, and is good in the overall cumulative ranking of the nations' basketball teams on FIBA.com, will not really be the country that produces the best basketball players and is good in basketball, but will be whichever country is smarter in recruiting anbd more skilled more and pays more. And so then the results of the competions and the cumulative ranking will be meaningless. Whoever is the winner of the FIBA basketball competitions and in the end hoists the gold, silver, and bronze medals will have an empty meaningless victory since the nations that won's basketball players did not win the medals themselves, but players from another land that might not have anything to do with their country.
It might just end up just being more of a pride thing than anything else, a figurehead award, a puppet award, just for show, because with such rampant importing anmd naturalization going on by basketball teams in each FIBA zone, the results of the competitions are empty and meaningless abd will have very little to do with whichever nations produce good basketball players and are good in basketball in reality.
Maybe in the end no nation is better than any other nation and produces better basketball players or worse basketball players than any other and is good or bad in basketball after all. Maybe it all depends on the individual you're talking about and we should instead judge each person individually and compare them--if we compare them--only one to another and individual to individual and not make blanket statements after all. And maybe in the end because the competition system is hopelessly corrupted and messed up, and we cannot always find which nation's basketball team is better because the competition system hides and obscures and the truth; that the only conclusion which we can draw after all, and that is allowed is that all humans all equal after all.
Comment