V
Victorious2
Guest
I can see our 2017 European Championship Team:
PG: Kenan Sipahi (1995-1.97), Berk Ugurlu (1996 - 1.92)
SG: Cedi Osman (1995 - 2.01), Furkan Korkmaz (1997 - 1.97)
SF: Okben Ulubay (1996 - 2.00), Tolga Gecim (1996 - 2.02 / PG-SG)
PF: Ersan Ilyasova (1987 - 2.08), Metecan Birsen (1994 - 2.06)
C: Omer Asik (1986 - 2.12), Emircan Kosut (1995 - 2.16), Egemen Guven (1996 - 2.10)
We need a combo guard who I believe can be Melih Mahmutoglu (1990 - 1.91) or Tayfun Erulku (1994 - 1.94). Also we still have Enes Kanter (1992 - 2.10), Furkan Aldemir (1991 - 2.08), Ilkan Karaman (1990 - 2.05), Emir Preldzic (1987, 2.05) who can make our national team easily. If they reach their potentials, I can see this team winning a medal in 2017 European Championship.
I am going to be critical here. These are not generations, it is mostly an overview of the talent in one particular year. In that respect, the U20 carries the most weight since it is close to professional level play which is mostly after 23. From U18 to U20, to 23 and then above that, players are going to be filtered.
Having 8 players of the years 95-97 in the senior team is being optimistic. It´s like playing poker without shoveling the cards.
If all these Turkish players will end up together four years from now, it would be a sign of weakness rather than strength. Consider, even a lower ranked team U20 could have one good prospect. Or let´s put it different. Imagine if say, Greece (It´s the only team of which I know an amount of young players) would have Charalampopoulos, Antekontoumpo, Papanikolaou, Pappas, Papagianis, Papapetrou, Bochoridis, Stamatis all born in approx. the same year in one U20 team. Wouldn´t they win gold? Makes you wonder doesn´t it? And I picked players from three different young teams. Senior teams have the luxury to do it from 10 different U20 teams.
Same is true for Turkey which will have players from many young teams. The very best of each year.
Last edited by a moderator: