c_fish said:
I guess it would be easier to understand why Arkadios referred to that person as a jew instead of an israelli if u guys knew that this word is used much more often in every day conversations than the israelli one,even if as a term,is wrong.
Very true, but like Goga stated just because it is a tradition doesn't mean it's correct. Negro (and Negress like Jewess) was used a long time to describe blacks (not too mention other words here in the U.S. - and other places), but it is no longer used because it is considered to be pejorative by man blacks.
c_fish said:
Also I find it a bit annoying raising antisemitism (or not) conversations every time something negative is mentioned about israellis.Some people even objected for using the "uber alles" expression while referring to Gershon in the greek bball threads.Should we make a flame if Pini drove (or had been ran over

) by a Mercedes or a BMW?Relax
I do also find it annoying when people (not just Jews) claim bigotry, but let's be honest, there is a reason why Jews are paranoid with Europeans.
Also, terms like "uber alles" may have not derogatory meaning intended, but do to the history of European Jews, it is definitely in bad taste. For instance - once again in the U.S. - people would call someone acting retarded a monkey. However, this would be in bad taste to call a black person this due to the history of white racism in equating blacks with monkeys.
Take Don Imus, many people couldn't see the racial implications of the phrase "nappy headed hos." Comedian Carlos Mencia did a bit on how it's stupid to claim this racist, One doesn't have to be black to have nappy hair (Jews being one of them

- ok, me); Ho has nothing to do with black either. And he would have a point, if he were to ignore HISTORY. Nappye headed ho derived from "wooley headed wenches" - what white men called black women. Therefore the term "nappy headed ho" can be considered perjorative towards black women.
Billy said:
Was the guy Jewish or not?
Lol.
Billy said:
How could it be "casual antisematism" when he refers to someones religion?
Lets try it with a few different religions shall we:
"Christian dude from last year", "Hindu dude from last year", "Muslim dude from last year", "Konfucian dude from last year", "Buddhist dude from last year", "Wicka dude from last year" and so on and so forth.
I fail to see that it even carries a negative slant. Its a very broad statement but it does not make it wrong/racist or whatever.
Completely different. Judaism is a national religion like Hinduism, compared to say Christianity and Islam, which are international religions. A national religion is based on mostly one ethnicity, while international religions cross over many different ethnicities. While there are Jews of different nationalities and colors, it is from migration and mixing, not converting (or forced) like Christianity.
Also one doesn't have to follow the Jewish "faith" (some have argued that Judaism is like Buddhism isn't a true religion in the sense of the word) to be a Jew. Plenty of Israelis are secular, but still considered Jews (though not by the Orthadox).
Also - atleast in the U.S. - many Jewish people don't like the term 'Jew.' They consider it outdated and even groups that practice antisemitism (NOI, KKK, NAZIs, etc...) usually use the term 'Jew' as a derogatory.
If you can't see how Jews would be sensitive to this and not see it as just calling a guy by his religion, then I don't know what to tell you but that you need to read history and see why some ethnicities are sensitive to certain things.
BTW, many followers of K'ung-fu-tzu are not that big on the word 'Confucius.'
Billy said:
Is there any other country in the world that grants citizenship based on religion?
reason for editing: changed "stament" to "statement"
More based on ethnicity. There are plenty of Jewish ethnics, but not religious, that are granted citizenship. BTW, this is no different from say Italian Americans, Irish Americans, Latinos (with Spanish/Portugese origin), getting granted citizenship because of their ancestors.
Digdis said:
Being both an Israeli and a Jew, I don't see any problem if people occasionally mix between the two. Judaism is unique in the sense it defines both a religion and a nation. Having Jews who are not Israeli citizens (like Ezra Williams who was also discussed in the EL rumors thread) but are entitled to citizenship on the one hand, and Israeli citizens who are not Jews (like the Israeli Arabs), surely contributes to this confusion. As I guess no one is expected to be familliar with all the racial differences in other nations, I don't have a problem with people not being familliar with mine.
What I really don't like is mixing this confusion with Anti-Semitism. No need to be so defensive. It also degrades the struggle against true Anti-Semitism (which exists big time).
See being a Jew and not Israeli, I feel they should be labeled differently. Plus like you stated, even more so many nonJewish Israelis would wouldn't lke to be called Jews when they are not.
Also, do you have a link to Ezra Williams being Jewish? I've never heard this and can't find where it states he's Jewish.
In the end I don't think it is "casual antisemitism" just cultural differences. However, that doesn't negate if a Jewish person is - let's say - sensitive to this subject. Either way it's simple, not all Jews are Israelis and not all Israelis are Jews.
Shalom.