I think you are not getting any of what Mavrick is trying to say. Qatar is a good team. There is no doubt about that and they actually beat a depleted Lebanon roster last summer during the FIBA ASIA cup in Tokyo. But truth to be said, Qatar is not in the same pool of China, Iran, Lebanon, Philippines, Jordan and South Korea skill-wise. Their players are pretty much old and they don't have anything new except for their naturalized player. Their style of basketball remain the same. Their main two weapons are their naturalized player and head coach Tom Wiseman. So what Mavrick is trying to say is that Qatar is a good team but Lebanon should, and in normal circumstances, have no problems to go through. And this what i actually think too. There is no arrogance nor complacency in all this.
Cheers.
Alright, let's reason together.
How would one interpret it if someone says, "I don't think Qatar is a threat"? Wouldn't that statement be interpreted as the one issuing such statement is so confident that Lebanon won't encounter difficulty beating Qatar? Believe me, any poster here would interpret that statement the same manner that I had interpreted it. How else would one interpret that?
I agree with Mavrick, Lebanon has beaten Qatar a No. of times in the past 8 years or so, and perhaps Mavrick's expectation/assessment on how Lebanon would fare vs. Qatar in this coming Asian Championship was based on the 2 teams match-ups in the last 8 years or so. But please remember, most (if not all) of those games where Leb beat Qatar were close ones. It's not like Lebanon had beaten Qatar by an average margin of 15+ pts.
But as I have pointed out, there's always that opportunity for the Qataris to improve. As I've mentioned, the Qataris has a new coach in Tom Wiseman, who I think is a good coach that could instill discipline & court savvy to the players. Then they now have a naturalized player-something that they don't have in the past. If Qatar was competitive vs. Lebanon in the past years, wouldn't be logical to expect that Qatar would even be more competitive now that they already have a naturalized player?
So for instance, Lebanon has beaten Qatar for the last 8 years by an average margin of let's say 4 to 6 pts.,
would you be sure that the outcome of Lebanese vs. Qatar game in August will be the same?
That's precisely my point. You just can't use the past games of Lebanon vs. Qatar to assess how these 2 teams will match-up against each other in the upcoming 2013 Asian Championship becoz a lot has changed for the 2 teams. How sure are you that new Lebanese naturalized player Loren Woods would play in good harmony with superstar Fadi El Khatib & the rest of the team? How sure are you that Loren Woods would be as effective as his predecessors Joe Vogel & Jackson Vroman? How sure are you that Jullian Khazzouh will be as effective as Brian Beshara Feghali? On the other hand, one can't tell what difference Qatar's new naturalized player Jarvis Hayes & coach Wiseman could bring to the team.
Do you expect Qatar to have stagnated?
BTW, how do you know that Qatar's style of game remain the same & they don't have anything new except their naturalized player? Have you watched their game
lately?
Talking about Qatari having "old" players. Aren't Loren Woods & Fadi El Khatib also old?
Please ponder on this Danny. China used to dominate Iran in the past countless of years. Iran was no match vs. China just a decade ago. But not anymore!
Nothing stagnates in this world my friend.
Every edition of Asian Championship brings new challenge to every participating teams.