• Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience
  • Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience

Playing basketball and politics at the same time...FIBA-Asia in its finaest...

  • Thread starter Thread starter vladski2
  • Start date Start date
The biggest problem here is that FIBA ASIA refused to acknowledge Filipino citizenship law as stated by our constitution.

Citizenship laws can be quite confusing and complicated

For my examples, I will use Philippine and US Law as these are the ones I am most familiar with. But I am sure you can extrapolate the argument and see how it can be confusing once applied to other nations' laws.

An example of complication:

Under US law, which uses jus loci, you are granted citizenship based on your location. So an American born in the Philippines by US law can elect to be a natural Filipino. But he needs to do so by his age of independence. However, it is odd because he will NOT be recognized by the Philippine government because he does not have a Filipino birth parent. He can elect to be naturalized though and HIS children will be automatically Filipinos. (i.e. MBA star Alex Compton and why he couldn't play for the national team)

Under Philippine law, which uses jus sangguini (sp?) you are AUTOMATICALLY given Filipino citizenship if any one of your parents are Filipino. Hence, even if you are born on the MOON. Or in the South Pole. Or in the friggin White House. If your parent has Filipino Citizenship, you are AUTOMATICALLY a Filipino.

So by that virtue, all you need is certification that ONE of the parents was Filipino.

Now, if the SBP didn't submit that, then it's their fault but HAGOP and FIBA ASIA company kept

They were also telling Foreign Media that it was a naturalization issue. (hence Mojado's fair but misguided assessment.) That is also why commentators mistakenly believe that the two guys are naturalized players and NOT natural born Filipinos.

Fact is, the passport issue is valid for ANY naturalization claim. HOWEVER, since the two players in question were NOT naturalized players, but rather legally naturally born Filipinos, then it cannot be applied to their status.

For example, does CHINA need to prove that Wang ZhiZhi got his passport at age 16? (heh, we can't even remember WHEN wang zhizhi was 16. I was monitoring international basketball during his youth team scandal which were never resolved.) Or does Rice University player Arsalan Kazemi to prove he got his Iran citizenship at age 16?

One thing the foreign media and fans do not know is that the local players association here in the Philippines is VERY STRICT on citizenship issues. They actually ask for more documentation than FIBA because there was a wave of pretenders in the late 90s who took jobs away from Filipinos because they were claiming to be Filipino-Foreigners and abusing this law to play in the Filipino League.

Because of the players union, we are now EXTREMELY strict on this issue. Even bloodlines and family trees are scrutinized right down to the ancestors of the players and their forefathers' citizenships. In fact, they try EVERYTHING POSSIBLE to discredit EVERY foreign born player who claims to be a Filipino. Which is why we are confident that all the players playing for the Philippines as Filipinos are indeed Filipinos by BLOOD.
 
Mojado failed!!!

Mojado failed!!!

I'm not sure what happened to my previous post... was it deleted???:(

Thank you for judging my character and since you know me pretty well.
Hanging sentence... but here's my take... You deserved it more than anyone else on here...

I never insulted you personally in my posts, yet you take this personally since you opened up this thread solely to promote your blog.
Since the issue with FIBA Asia and the SBP over Lutz and Lassiter has been discussed in this forum in many places before and has been more fruitful regarding facts and shortcomings of the involved parties, I don't see a reason to open up another thread.

You are right for the first time. There is really no reason to open a new thread with regards to lassiter's and Lutz's cases. And I really never intend to open one for that matter. It was you only who thinks that I opened a new thread about Lutz's and Lassiter's to promote my blog when in fact I never asked anyone on here to discuss in this thread what I have written in my blog. I've been a member of this forum since 2007 and been writing blogs since 2010. Never in my posts did I promote my blog nor did I linked my blog page in my signature. And even to this date, you will never find signature in my posts linking to my blog pages. You failed when you said that I opened this thread only to promote my blog. And even so, I didn't see anything wrong about that. I write blogs for pleasure, like most people do. Is linking personal Home/Web Page like blog pages constitute forum rule violation? If not, then what is your problem, Mojado?

So to me, your blog is quite underachieving to say this in a friendly way. You wanted to open up a thread to share your thoughts with us fellow readers, yet you don't want to hear a different opinion on the matter, as well as you dont allow any critics. Your direct answer is polemic and since you didn't check the link that I've posted (
http://philboxing.com/news/story-60165.html ), you are not even doing better than me. :D

I don't care whether I'm doing better or you are doing better coz I don't compete.

I don't have problems with anybody who critic my work as long as it is done objectively. I do have problems with people like you who don't know how to apply objectivity when doing a review on other people's work. That's the reason why you failed. You failed when you say that:
  1. I didn't mention Hagop's designation in FIBA when in fact it was clearly mentioned in third Paragraph, sentence 2 on my first post.
  2. I opened a thread to discuss what I have written in my blog and to promote it when in fact, in this particular thread, I was asking the forum members for their opinion on politicking in Asian Basketball.
  3. You failed because this is not about my blog and
  4. this is not about Lassiter's and Lutz's cases, either.
  5. You failed when you got it all wrong, genius.

To put it in your very own words: You are lacking the eye for important details.
Look also to the comments by other posters in this thread and you can see what was acutally going on between Khajirian and the SBP and how the rules applied or didn't apply since Khajirian tried to harm Philippines'national-team by trying to block both players even after they were cleared which is a low-blow to me.
That was actually the reason why I came up with the idea on opening a thread about Politicking in basketball and how it ruined the beauty of the sport. And here you failed again because you said that I opened this thread for my personal gain when in fact, I never ask to discuss on here what I have written in my blog. The article was used as a mere springboard for the topic on politics in basketball. My second post clearly outlined how I intend this thread would go.

BTW, your childish answer is on the same level as Mr. Khajirian's doings during the last week.
A childish act is when a person fails to comprehend the very work he criticizes, for failure to take into account the details and facts presented. A childish act is when people like you presents false claims and twists facts to bash others. In other words, irrational.

Don't feel sorry for me, sir (Don't try to sound polite when you are clearly not), feel sorry for yourself for attacking me personally without a reason. I never intended to bash you, just wanted to correct obvious mistakes.
I'm not trying to sound polite coz I really am not. In fact, I am being sarcastic with the way I'm responding to you. So don't try to play words with me coz I am not impress with your circus act.

If you want to talk about politics in basketball, start with the PBA and why teams aren't allowing it's players to play in your national-team. That would be a good start and you may know more about the topic then I do.

I don't need your unsolicited advice. I know what I'm talking about when I started this topic. You are at lost and have shown how you failed on many occasions. I don't need to bail myself out. You need it more, genius coz you failed.

Resting the case with this post.
May you rest in peace!!!

Feel free to write what's on your mind, I won't answer to it anymore, you disqualified yourself to me with your answer.
More reason to chuckle:D. Disqualified myself? Are you out of your mind, genius?

Purely Kindergarten.
Kindergarten? Yeah, right. I hate to ask this.. but how about the structure of your sentences? post grad :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
youre such an ass vladskie boy..for once step dowm from that pedestal...feel the earth..its good for you.
 
Back
Top