D
DAdmiral2
Guest
What I'm implying is that FIBA doesn't put much weight on jus sanguinis or descent as much as it does on technicality or documentation. The best proof of that is those Qatari players of Bosnian descent whose parents are obviously Bosnian with no Qatari bloodline or descent whatsoever. But these players are treated by FIBA as Qatari local players becoz they obtained Qatari citizenship prior to their 16th birthday. It didn't matter to FIBA that the parents of these players are not of Qatari descent.
On the other hand, to those half-breed or even full-blooded Filipino players who were born abroad, it doesn't matter to FIBA that these players are born of Filipino parents (jus sanguinis), what will matter to FIBA is whether these players laid claim of their Filipino citizenship (most common evidence is Philippine passport) before they reach 16 yrs of age or not.
Hope you get my point.
Your point only refers to the emphasis of the passport before U16 rule , ( this is a no brainer established that it is based mainly on a document).
what we're referrig to recently in light of Abassi snd QMB is for exception cases, not the U16 outright rule or birth in country provision. . ( BTW I thought QMB had a passport before 16 , and was not applying for an exception? Lol, we all know what happened with that (document tampering etc).
now limited to exception caaes , lineage indeed is a factor for consideration, and it is verified by documents ( which Abassi has )., can be argued Abassi has stronger lineage connections to parent of Taiwan, than many Fil foreigners ( who's parents might not even be citizens or permanent residents of the Philippines) again and again it's not sharing similar enthicity blood that matters . Otherwise all African lineage people are connected to an African Nation