What's the use of having tall players,when the team will go small ball.
Actually, small ball can be acceptable if that lineup is composed of the team's best combination of players. If a guy like Dwight Ramos mans the 4, and is our best player at that spot, so be it. But if there are better combinations and/or taller players that can help guys like Dwight slide to 3 or even 2, go with that. You adjust to your best players, or to the matchups, depending on the game.
Personally, I prefer positionless small ball wherein everyone is a guard for developing players that measure 6'6" and under, and players that are 13 and under. That way, if the kids grow taller, they might translate that agility, lateral quickness, and guard skillset to taller positions like 2, 3, and even small ball 4.
The problem with our conception of small ball here is that it means playing literally smaller players at the 3. Guys like Chan, Pogoy, Fonacier, Marcio, and Thirdy play the 3 under our conception of small ball. Actual small ball, in my view, covers only the 4 and 5 spots. So if Chan, Pogoy, Fonacier, Marcio, and Thirdy play the 3, but have guys like Pingris, RDO, Tamayo, Baltazar, Mason at the 4, and Kai, Japeth, and June Mar at the 5, that's still not small ball. A better small ball lineup would have a tall wing like Navarro or Oftana, or even Dwight, and guys like Malonzo or Brownlee at the 4. So we really have to change our conception of small ball.