I
IPC2
Guest
I'm iffy on SMC heading SBP, though.
Although they have developed Fran Yu, Jio Jalalon, Arvin Tolentino, and Aris Dionisio, can they translate that development to FIBA? Because, the way I see it, they have developed players for PBA, and not necessarily for FIBA.
Plus, with Chua around, are these guys willing to take advice from a Tab-caliber foreign coach, especially with regards to tactics and development?
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
I have no trust on SMC as well.
The SMC in the 80's, 90's & early 2000's is very different from the current SMC bunch of guys.
Despite of some blunders here & there, I still believe MVP group could do a better job than SMC.
Yeah. SMC under Danding was more open. And heck, even when Eala was with them. Hired Ron Jacobs and Rajko Toroman. But well, shit happened.
I agree... Remember Chua is one of the main people at BCAP that oppose foreign coaches, And Chua doesn't know how to transact with FIBA people... Can't mess with them... Can he appeal ineligible players for a exemption? Can he sacrifice his teams for FIBA tournaments? Can he open some changes at SBP? That is a question mark.... Even SBP some flows, they are better than BAP before... with BAP, we don't have a real team in womens division, We can't consistently bring youth teams in the past... Only problem on SBP is they allowed PBA to control SBP numerous times... Remember a good basketball program starts with a better/organize basketball leagues... PBA is a mess, so SBP affected on that PBA mess!!!!
So SMC manages UST basketball now. If UST manages to have a good development program under them, close to or exceeding the quality of Ateneo's program, capable of producing players that are fit for international games, talent-wise and position-wise, and has a coach with an offensive system capable of breaking Ateneo's defense or a defense capable of stopping Ateneo, then I might be more open to the possibility of SMC managing the NT program.
For now, I'm still iffy, and I still have my misgivings.