S
We have to have all the picture. Surely 00's team better, but 10's is new story in the context and while Lithuania lost a lot of talent there are a lot nuances. In 10's there's no so many absolute powerhouses like it used to be in 00's - Serbia, Lithuania, Spain, Greece, France and even Germany and Italy, you wouldn't mess with those like you can now with any teams except France and Spain (and those are still more tricky than powerhouses used to be in 00's). Second, If you would closely look at 2010 that team was really something, not only swept Argentina in 4finals, but beat Spain (with or without Pau it was still a heck of a team) 2 times that summer. One in Vilnius friendly game, doesn't happen too often, and than in WC. Also, very important thing is that 2011 actually played at the very high level just before 4finals and beat very strong Serbia, Germany and lost to France (with Parker, Noah, Diaw) only -6 and it was a close game. I do agree that 10's team wasn't anywhere near 00's, but that team was competitive and the fall of the level wasn't that deep that the bar would lowered radically. That's why I'm talking about the fact that it was pretty controversial - it wasn't like people had no different thoughts. Even in 2012 Lithuania had few strong preparation games and the same game against USA showed that this team could play, but it didn't stick together or got tired or whatverer, but there were sparkles and potential.
That's why I don't think it's like changing Alekna with Gudzius in on hand, and on the other I talk about, let me call it, politics, conservatism, culture. It's a culture and structure which shouldn't be evaluated only by material objects (valuing current particular capital of best player's talent), it's the whole Lith basketball school, attitude, I could even say spirit which is immanent in coaches, players, fans, whole country if you may. It's nearly Hegelian type of holistic thinking. In that perspective Lithuania surely lived a failure, crisis in 2012 and basketball surely reached the level beyond the simple game, it's a cultural thing and it's developed emotionally/spiritually just as practically (infrastructure of Lith BB). The values of very serious attitude towards developing high culture and goals are settled in basketball schools of kids, leagues, clubs, national teams, young coaches, kinds and families - that's why, even if Lithuania's level actually drops, there's instant goal to get back on track and to become better. You guys reducing the phenomena of basketball in Lithuania to way too simple categories. It's probably no-where else like this in the world except maybe USA, they also have that huge intrinsic values of basketball. I don't know how to put it to you better. Maybe we can look at history - after second WW, Germany was demoralised and paralysed as a country, but it was just a matter of time when this country will rise, because they have high intrinsic values and cultural basis and tradition of high culture. That kind of countries, even with lesser army fight harder and stronger than others, they deal with different sort of problems more effectively. To reduce everything ONLY to sheer talent is not fair when we talk about Lithuanian BB. I don't suggest Lithuania should aim for 1-4 even if all the key players are out, but I'm saying that it should be taken much more complex and aiming high for Lith basketball is very natural and traditional thing and because of that comes good and consistent results.
Darjus got injured again, now it's meniscus and it might be season ending injury, so I guess we can forget about him in NT. Knowing that situation with bigs is getting closer to last year, when there were no D-Mo, no Kleiza, now Javtokas is under big question-mark too, and remembering how badly Kazlauskas wanted Darjus in NT, I guess there was a good chance for him to finish his NT career in Olympics. Moreover, he was having really good season as back-up big in Reggio Emilia. But now it's not likely to happen what so ever
Darjus got injured again, now it's meniscus and it might be season ending injury, so I guess we can forget about him in NT. Knowing that situation with bigs is getting closer to last year, when there were no D-Mo, no Kleiza, now Javtokas is under big question-mark too, and remembering how badly Kazlauskas wanted Darjus in NT, I guess there was a good chance for him to finish his NT career in Olympics. Moreover, he was having really good season as back-up big in Reggio Emilia. But now it's not likely to happen what so ever
We cant go only with on 2m10+ player [/B].Even is Motiejunas is in ,i doutb he can guard powerfull centers as i mentione.If we do not want have same problem as in 2012,better hope that one of them Darjus/Javtokas would be ready to back up Valanciunas for one more time.
Motiejunas was going against any center just before injury, including such monsters as Deandre Jordan and he kept him off the glass very well. The thing is D-Mo is big enough and very smart at positioning, boxing out. He won't collect a lot rebounds, but he's a great team rebounder. D-Mo could do so many things which NT lacked in 2015 - he would improve ball movement, would provide smooth in and out game (JV failed it, even though he's improving with passing out skills), he stretches the floor better than Jankunas and Lithuania would have legit second guy to go player after JV offensively. And JV would collect more easy points because D-Mo is a great and willing passer. NT would be so much more all around team with D-Mo. Fingers crossed, there are still chances he'll play.
Yeah sure Motiejunas before injury would be big spark for our team on both ends of the floor.I loved his defence in pikenroolls agains guards...But Motiejunas now is like 30% of his own himself.Not sure how much can he improve in 5 months ,because now he looks not faster than Jonas does.Either way surely even 50% ready Motiejunas should be taken to the team,and kazlauskas will take him.But problem will be his new contract also and talks with club.Knowing nba they will say you are after seriuos injury and have to prepare your body for next season,not play seriuos competion like Olympic games in your free time...Alot "if" in this playing this summer.Somebody from our media could ask Donatas what is his own thoughts about playing in Olympics.He missed 2012 because he declined offer,i doubt he will want not to miss second olimpics...In 2020 Motiejunas will be already 30...
Do you think Pocius should be in the team? After thinking for a while my crazy answer is still - yes. The guy is pure SG player, a bit slower and less explosive, but still can get to the FT line, still can get inside and make a lay up or to find an open man, still can be pretty tough, also he still is better defender that any other SG after Seibutis. Even if he declined I think he should be rotational player.
Here's Eurobasket 2015 rotation:
Kalnietis (34) Lekavicius (9)
Seibutis (26) Milaknis (15), Gailius (8,5)
Maciulis (31) Kuzminskas (23)
Jankunas (24) Sabonis (7)
JV (27) Kavaliauskas (12), Javtokas (10)
I'm looking forward to see Kalnietis playing less and being fresh at knock out stage. Kuzminskas should play more. I want him to be second best scorer on the team after JV. He's a beast and having a great season. And call me crazy I can see Sabonis being one of the most productive bigs already this summer. The guy seem to be fearless and just fundamentally sound. Specially if D-Mo won't come, but I hope he will and if he does I want him to grab back-up centers minutes because currently there's no reliable back-up center option. I think D-Mo and Sabonis are 2 best options. Javtokas is too old and washed out (even injured at the moment), Kavaliauskas is big time foul prone and weak defensively generally and Gudaitis is too raw. Generally if all team gathered it will be athletic, tough and lengthy team, really nice packed at 5-3 positions.
Lithuania will play in friendly tournament in Buenos Aires 25-27 of July, rivals Argentina and Australia
Btw, Olympic draw will be held on Friday, 16.30 LT time
Probably nothing is oficiall yet with this but I heard US wants to play Lithuania in a friendly.
Just curious, where did you hear it from?
Pocius has dissapointing season, but knowing what kind of personal issues he had to go throught... Well, I tend to forget that part of the season and look further to see what he'll offer in final stages of the season and of course NT camps. Overall thinking, do we have lot of options to choose from? Seibutis is a lock, Milaknis probably will be there too, we need such shooter. Who else? Maybe Grigonis can surprise. Can't see other options tbh
Well maybe Ulanovas would be rookie in NT, but he is not rookie in high level basketbal. he plays average 29min every game in Euroleague TOP16, so he will be more then ready to be back-up SG/SF