Shaw, Auris,
I see your point, Petrauskas is emotional commentator, good narrator, articulates well, has sense of humour, but that's not enough. In recent years I watched many NBA games, I read a lot of basketball American BB articles and that's the roots and fundamentals of BB language. The problem is that Petrauskas doesn't have it and he makes ridiculous comments. Like Kazlauskas says "oh, Zalgiris can live with Shengelia's threes", then Grigonis takes his usual floater off the p'n'r (and misses), one of his lenthal weapons and Petrauskas says "CSKA can live with such Grigonis shots". I mean, duuude. In NBA, no matter how cool the commentator is, he's PREPARED. He understands the game and he never will say complete BS. Petrauskas in the last game missed at least 2 clear moments when Zalgiris players where fouled in active shooting, like it's even cringy, "oh, that won't be in an active shooting", when Grigonis clearly made 2 and 1 and ref didn't hesitate a single second to show it. He makes tons of misreads of actual game, he's super non PRO. Ordinary or not people love him, that's just ridiculous, Kazlauskas is forced to correct him all the time. And his mistakes are super annoying. Commentators should be the sharpest watchers of the game, he just spoils it.