Gasol couldn't help them but DeAndre could. Golden State has traded backcourt depth for wing depth, and are not the same team when Steph sits. Bell was a huge addition but Cleveland is four deep with versatile forwards who are difficult to guard. Golden State has never faced a team like that. If Cleveland can acquire DeAndre while only giving up say Smith, Frye, Zizic, Cedi, and picks then they will have two very tough bigs down low plus Love who can give you thirty on any given night. Then you add in IT, who was the most unguardable point guard in the league last year. Who's stopping him? Nobody. So he gets Steph in foul trouble. Then you attack Draymond and Zaza and who does Golden State have left that's proven? Klay and KD will be sitting before Golden State knows what hit them. Now you have a bunch of unproven young guys versus some of the best, most experienced players at their positions plus LeBron. You attack Draymond, Zaza, and Iguodala and that defense is finished. You can easily draw fouls on Steph and KD, and Klay isn't that hard to do it against either. That leaves their offense without Steph, their frontcourt without Zaza, and their defense without Draymond. Is that really enough to beat Cleveland? I think not.
But that depends on a lot, like finding a way to shed the JR Smith and Frye salaries rather than trading Shumpert or TT. I think the Clippers would go for Zizic and Cedi plus a pick or two if they're smart because most of the offers they get from other teams will probably include big salaries for multiple years. IF Cleveland can do that though, they can definitely beat the Warriors. Especially if they trade Zaza or McGee like is rumored.
cleveland is just too old to handle Warriors speed in long serries.
Who Thomas gonna defend Curry or Thompson in defence? Its like shooting over a chair for best snipers ever...Irving was one of th e toughest Pg mathcups for Curry in recent years.You could see Irving has put some fear in Currys eyes,I dont believe Thomas can do that.Ir ving will be very missed,when they gonna face best backourt in nba.
Durant at age of 29 will not lose to 33 James in their matchup.As he shown in last 8 games between those teams.
Warriors is 3 times better defending team than Cavaliers.And you are talking how bad warriors defence is? Cavaliers defence is just joke compared to warriors one.
When they put death lineup Green,Durant,Igoudala,Thompson,Curry... its Curry and 4 very good defenders,hard to break such lineup.If you gonna put big boddys ale Love,Thompson together they gonna smoke you by speed . Bum bum and you are -15 in couple minutes.You must play small against warriors death lineup no other choise.Cavs was hanging in for 2years because they had best small ball player in league Lebron,but even he cant handle that when they added to Durant other one very scary small ball player.
Even if they trade for Deandre i dont see how he can be effective against death lineup.Clippers are dominated by warriors in last 3 years badly like 15-1...Deandre is not an answer here.He is not effective against style warriors play.
Its not a question will be enough to beat Cleveleand,the real question is can Cavs make it interesting serries...Healthy Warriors have enough to sweep anybody...
Warriors bench is not just young players you picturing,they have experience proven players like West,Livingston,Igoudala +Pachulia going with those young guns.Warriors have very good experience and youth mix.Cleveland has too many old player worse mix for sure.
I feel warriors will tested more seriuosly againts Rockets/Spurs than againts this old Cavs roster.