Net defense rating is nothing more than a team stat. You can also play "good defense" in terms of rating if you regularly outscore your opponent by much. The reason the Nuggets suffer defensively is not because Jokic is on it, he has great stats defensively (only being behind Gobert and Draymond Green in some stats), but because their bench is atrocious at defense. Ever since they traded Jerami Grant they lost their versatility on defense as a team. Look up Nugs defensive rating when he's on the court vs off it this year.
Also don't tell me to watch the plays, I do. Jokic defends the PNR very well like Kai does. My future 2-time MVP has like what, 3-4 game saving blocks this season? The problem is that a lot of people on IBN use a TEAM STAT to pursue a narrative. Stats and blocks are INDIVIDUAL stats. While I agree that they don't tell the whole story, the fact that you still think Jokic is a bad defender despite racking up individual numbers like that is telling. Marc Gasol doesn't have gaudy stats in the Grit n Grind Grizz? That's because his team was a great defensive team and regularly slowed down the pace. You have to take stats into context, that means stats AND the eye test, but people here love using offensive and defensive rating when comparing players, like net ratings are used for TEAMS. Please, when comparing players let's stop using net ratings, because when that happens the scope of the comparison stops being about players and becomes about teams.
Tell me the truth, are those people just scared to be grouped with people positively hyped on Kai so they say stuff they don't mean? Because I don't know the reason and won't pretend to psychoanalyze people from my computer. It irks me to see that there's still this pervasive notion that Kai cannot defend the PNR, when he's done numerous times. Aside from strength there's practically nothing one can complain about him defense-wise, he eve doesn't lose his man that often now compared to before.