analyzed2
New member
Can you name the players sir?
In the Philippines there is Greg, Spencer and Wright (17 yrs old)
In NZ Fotu, Frank, Jones, Diwa, Alok
Can you name the players sir?
In the Philippines there is Greg, Spencer and Wright (17 yrs old)
In NZ Fotu, Frank, Jones, Diwa, Alok
In the Philippines there is Greg, Spencer and Wright (17 yrs old)
In NZ Fotu, Frank, Jones, Diwa, Alok
Issac Fotu at 17 years old applied to the international federation for exemption and was granted as a non-restricted player or FIBA local eligible. But Fotu and his family moved to New Zealand when he was seven and settled down in Auckland while Angelo went here in Philippines not as a refugee but to become an student-athlete..
Yes, he just has more years, how about Greg?
There isn't a specified # of years but again back to the principle of the U16 rule
Developed by country
Adopted the county as a minor
Is dependent on parental supervision and financially on locals
In the Philippines there is Greg, Spencer and Wright (17 yrs old)
In NZ Fotu, Frank, Jones, Diwa, Alok
After reading FiBA rules and not basing it on Philippine law (which is a seperate discussion)
You can see why as host of the 2023 World Cup and assuming Kouame has a Philippine passport, if the SBP requested for an exemption for both Clarkson and Kouame with one of them to remain as designated naturalize player, FIBA would grant Kouame's request and keep Clarkson as a naturalize player. Fiba officials will have justification for such decision as seen in its rules if questioned by rival Asian teams competing for the one Olympic spot. No way can they justify Clarkson getting an exception.
I've already discussed and showed the financial merits of why Kouame and Clarkson for 2023
Hopefully with all of this one can now see the rational for the blueprint
Greg Slaughter:
-has gotten philippine passport after 16 years old(dual citizenship)
- developed locally(UV, Ateneo)
Angelo Kouame
- will get philippine passport maybe at 21-22 years old(naturalization route)
- went here in Philippines to play basketball and not as a refugee
- developed locally(Ateneo)
16. Any player with two legal nationalities or more, by birth or by naturalisation, may choose at any age the national team for which he wishes to play. Any such choice must be made in a written declaration to FIBA. This provision applies also to any player having acquired legal nationality by birth, or having the right to acquire a second nationality at birth, but who does not lay claim to this right until a given time in the future.
[Note: for exceptions see articles 3-20 and 3-21].
21.(a) A national team participating in a Competition of FIBA may have only one player on its team who has acquired the legal nationality of that country by naturalisation or by any other means after having reached the age of sixteen (16). This provision applies also to any player having the right to acquire a second nationality at birth but who did not lay claim to this right until after having reached the age of sixteen (16).
24. For any player who has two or more legal nationalities by birth or by naturalisation, the national member federation for which the player wishes to play must obtain written certification from the national member federation of the country(-ies) corresponding to the player's other nationality(-ies), in which it is stated that he has not taken part in a main official competition of FIBA as a member of its national team.
If the request for this certification remains unanswered, FIBA may issue provisional authorisation to the national member federation making the request. After a period of one year, this authorisation shall be considered final.
The rules clearly state that whether you are naturalized citizen or natural born citizen but both obtained passport after 16. You are both seen by FIBA as the same.
I dont think you could bring up how they got their citizenships. As stated by FIBA that whether you receive through naturalization after 16 or by birth and got it after 16 you are both just the same in their eyes. Didn’t spencer and greg both get recruited to play basketball same as ange? And as you said both developed locally.
Just a question sir, does the SBP or Coach Tab knows about this Kouame-possible FIBA exemption to play as local thing? Did this idea comes from you or from SBP or coach Tab?
Can you name players(not refugee) who got naturalized after 16 years old and got to play as local FIBA-eligible and not as a naturalized player?
Diba Greg and Spencer
^^
And as sighted under FIBA rules there is no difference from their view if you acquire citizenship via natural born with other forms of acquisition.
The difference in classification is purely based on age of citizenship declaration and residency
Your distinction fits the Philippines context of acquiring citizenship, but it isn't the same in many other countries. As an example the migration to citizenship process in NZ is the same for acquisition due to relationship (Fotu) as it is based on other merits, study (Alok) residency and work ((Frank)
What seperates them for FIBA purposes is not how they acquired citizenship and on what basis, but the age of declaration (if teenager - local)
If you're looking for examples maybe look at Qatar, (I'm not familiar with their players), but as some are claiming here foreigners who acquired passport before 16 yrs old are classified as locals
Are there foreigners who acquired Qatari passport after 16 years old and was classified by FIBA as local?