I just explaining to you because you thinking NZL as same strength as Finland or DR even it's not... This is not 2002 version anymore.....
It's not actually just my thinking (or opinion) it's actually verifiable by last 3 world cup results(Not 2002)
NZ classified as a mid tier is verifiable by results (not opinion)
2010 : 12th place out of 24 teams (2nd round)
2014: 15th place out of 24 teams (2nd round)
2019 : 19 th place out of 32 teams
Include any team in Africa and Asia with the same mid place results to be classified as mid tier.
if you want to base it on perceived strength ( then that's opinion , which everyone has a different opinion ) .. and BTW how many times do i have to say i agree Gilas and teams prefer new zealand as beatable as compared to DR and Finland, so where is the bias you're talking about there ? It's actually you that are ignoring .. results and reputation that NZ has better results than any asian team for the last 3 world cups (not 2002 LOL, trying to deflect point again )
as to comparing Finland and DR World cup results , well here .. v ( BTW again i have no problem if preference is to beatable NZ, but simply on results they are actually in same tier )
Based on purely world cup performance (not level of talent or performance outside world cup ) indeed over the last decade NZL results are similar to 2nd tier Euro teams and 2nd tier Americas teams . The record results are all there. (Look below)
2010 - NZ beat Canada and France
2014 , NZ beat Ukraine and Finland
2019 , NZ beat Turkey and Montenegro
Yes admitted NZL is not as strong as Finland and DR , but overachieves in World cup (last 3). But they are verified mid tier world cup performers. Unlike Asia and most African teams. The results speak for itself