Yes, you are biased a lot. I mean Navaro, Llull, they were not even main players in titles. For instance, Doncic was the guy in wining his 2nd title, Tavares in 3rd, Chacho in 1st
If I would biased as you the best player in EL was Bogdan, but he left too early and didn't win enough titles to be considered as the best.
Larkin needs one more title to make step ahead of Parker, who won 2 in a row as main player. Larkin has the most Mvp of the round awards so far and he is still active
I am talking about numbers and you about perception
WHAAAAAAT?! Hahahaahaha you have to be kidding me.
Ok, here we go.
Navarro played in the slow ball era. Anyway he averaged 15 points back then year by year. When he won his 1st title he had great contribution when he was very young. 2010, Barca champions, he is the F4 MVP. Destroyed Oly in the final game. Year before he is EL MVP. Winning MVP back then was much tougher than now. And he always played 20-25 mins. Pascual was always the coach who shared minutes properly. He didn't have Ataman as a coach. If he had he would play 30-35 mins and average 20 points per game. If he plays now he would have 20 points easy per game.
Llull, 3 times champion. EL MVP. Like Navarro played 20 mins average per game. Most importantly had biggest balls every time Real needed. Clutch and winning player. Larkin showed he can't win anything without Micic. Llull at F4 -
2015- had great games against Oly and Fener
2018- he is the only reason why Real won against CSKA
2023- after injuries and everything that happened and at his age he scored shot for the title. WINNING PLAYER. Micic was the one who was making crucial shots for Efes at the F4s.
Larkin has 0 MVPs, 0 F4 MVPs. Only thing he has is scoring title, same as Navarro. Llull was never main scorer. He does everything. Larkin didn't do anything in Baskonia. He floped this year so hard. Last year same story. When Micic was healthy Efes was playing great. Without him they are crap.
I repeat, If Navarro plays now or if Llull is 5, 6 years younger they would average 20 points. If you talk about numbers than Nigel Hayes is better player than Fotsis or Printezis because he averages more points? Or Lorenzo Brown better than Spanoulis? Your dearly WilbeKING than Diamantidis? That's crazy way to compare.
Maybe you can make the case Larkin is better than Llull even for me he isn't but to say he is better than Navarro is crime against humanity.