• Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience
  • Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience

2023 Lithuanian NT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Straight forward2
  • Start date Start date
Dude, Pau scored 19pts against Lithuania in 2008. That's a fact. Besides, he had great defensive performances in 2010. In 2015, 2016 he was too old. JV wasn't a kid back then, specially 2016. Why you try to deny something what Kalnietis, Saras, Kleiza always emphasized? Kleiza talked about in recent podcast. Kalnietis once said "Kleiza was our leader, but the Javtokas was even more important. He was covering all the defense". I remember these words very well.
 
I believe that 2 nba level 18pts average centers would help NT win more medals that 2 defensive type 6pts average euroleague centers.

No double teams for Jonas and Domas because shooters all around them in ltu NT 00s? Easy game for our nba centers compare to todays double teams they are facing.

Nobody would double team Domas or Jonas when Saras,Siska,Macas is waiting for a ball. Easily atleast 2 medals more.

Now you contradict your self. You recently repeated many times that it shouldn't be best 12 players, it should be best puzzle of 12 players. Those pieces who make the best team. 00's team basically had zero issues offensively. We were best offensive team in 2003 with 91ppg. But we could also play the D cause we had Eurelka, M.Zukauskas, Siskauskas. And later Javtokas. With JV and Domas the D would be shit, that's a fact.

The least that team needed is to watch how JV slowly bouncing the ball in the paint and takes weeks to make a decision. I mean we had freakin Jasikevicius and Siskauskas, likely 2 best decision makers in Europe at that moment and Macijauskas who could shoot the light out every single game.
 
Javtokas peak in NT was 2010-2012 thats not 00s. What kalnietis said that was about 2010s Javtokas.Stop mixing up things and show your limitations about what happend.

Gasol 37pts in 2003, Gasol 25pts in 1/4 2006, 2008 semifinal Gasol fouled entire froncourt with 19pts .So where was those Zukauskas/Javtokas elite defence in 00s?

Valanciunas was 23-24 in 2015-16 .So Brazdeikis at 23 is young,but Jonas at same age was already experienced veteran? :) what a double standarts.

I repeat Javtokas was as old as Gasol every time they met. Age is not excuse they both are born in 1980.



But ok ok i got it your point Zukauskas/Javtokas with their 6 pts european averages play such big part in 00s that even for 2 high quality nba centers from the future its would be impossible to help more 00s NT than those 2 very limited offensive centers did.

To honestly believe that Javtokas/Zukauskas was better overall players than Valanciunas/Sabonis just wow :) This is tottaly diffrent level of basketball insanity even for you dude
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lately your posts are pathetic, dude. You contradict your self, jumping from hyper pessimism (at the start of this thread) to hyper optimism now (we were so close!). You're not worthy replies cause you can't even read. I'll give you few more cents maybe you'll get it, maybe not, but I'm tired schooling people who don't even want to learn to pay attention. In 10 years you didn't learn to read, that's the saddest part. At least you improved some of your English though.

To keep more or less prime Pau with 19pts is good. It's not 37 at least.

Valanciunas prior 2016 already saw 5 official tournaments. How is that not experienced? I mean 24yo JV already was matured enough. He had a successful EB a year a go in 2015.

So what? Players decline in different pace. Lukauskis is playing well at 43. Does that mean all players of his age group should be able to do the same? Javtokas declined sooner than Pau. Pau is pretty exceptional you know...

And for the last time (how many times I already wrote this?). Javtokas is not better player than JV, Domas. He's much better defender and thus much better fit for 00's team. Maybe this way you will actually get it :)

Anyway, it's my last reply for you for a while now. It's not about different opinions, it's about your inability to keep up with argumentation and conversation culture. Unfortunately you highly lack tons of cognitive skills due to your lack of education - lack of precise reading, getting what others say, attention, self-reflection, your language is poor, lack of respect, instant jumping to conclusions and etc. Practice, practice, practice. Without that you here are just an object of patronizing.
 
"Our defense suffered the most and this is where the most corrections should be made in the future."

That's all I wanted to hear from Maksvytis and looking forward to corrections and adjustments.
 
Good thing no emotional desicions was made after eurobasket 2022.

I have no problems with coaching staff of 2022 .It was good coaching compared to 3 assistents coaches disaster in 2021.

One last seconds made/missed shot againts best teams doesnt make coaches/players useless or bad. First 39,5 minutes shown that they are very high quality NT even when they played best teams.

Im for continuity what i saw in eurobasket 2022 . To go far in one game playoofs tournament any NTs needs some luck too.

in 2023 same coaching staff and 9 main players gonna comeback one year smarter and tougher emotionally.

Next summer if i would be coach i would do what Popovich did with Spurs in 2013/2014 in first week of training.

Show last 5 minutes of those 4 games of eurobasket on big screen that all NT players would see mistakes they did and remind them one shot sometimes can decide NT is playing semifinal or going home after 1/8.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maksvytis shortly, but correctly expressed 2 main issues of NT 2022. The biggest - defense. Second - closing games.

We won't become good closing team until we have guys who are true leaders of EL or NBA teams. In NBA Sabonis was pretty much franchise player for Indiana, but bigs do not close games. And even Sabonis is more like 2nd or 3rd best player for winning NBA team. There's no other leaders of their clubs. Grigonis sort of was of Zalgiris, but only for a half of year, he's not the leader. He's a solid role player. In the future I think we will have such breed. We have good prospects, but it's not gonna happen in one year.

While defense can be improved easier. You can improve defense with good role players. Elite offense and game closing can come only with true perimeter stars and leaders, so it's much harder to do it. You either have it or not. If there's no such guys you can't do much. That's why I say that our main goal should be improved defense for 2023 and Maksvytis agrees obviously.

I see Domas, JV, Kuzminskas, Butkevicius, Brazdeikis, Grigonis, Lekavicius, Jokubaitis as 8 locks from 2022 roster.

Main candidates for 4 last spots would be Ulanovas, D. Giedraitis, Tubelis, Sedekerskis, Marciulionis. These guys can play D and provide as role players. Yes, I would even want to see if Marciulionis can bully his opponents defensively for 10 minutes already in the exhibition stage (PS: both Margiris and Zemaitis perimeter D is overrated, they are not NT material).
 
2 raw ncaa rookies and one very young guard gonna fix bad NT defence ? haha what a fantasy :)

never saw inexperienced rookies not from nba/euroleague being some elite defenders in fiba especially guards .Defence is not just speed,lenghts or so on. To be good in defence without experience in that level its very difficult and we gonna put 3 inexperienced kids who never even defended such level players ale be our stoppers ? :) jeazz where such fan comes

Dinosour experience you literally are clueless what works and what wins in men basketball.

Simply look what coaches are doing in those fiba games maybe you gonna learn thing or two.Less reading just about potential theories of kids tallents.



NT 2015 didnt have closer,but they had good team defence with smart experience players in all positions that was making no stupid desicions in game endings.

Closing games is not just hit game winner,its more of making fundementally smart 4-5 desicions in last 3 minutes to give your team best chance to win.

in 2022 we saw chaos comming from our 3 main guards in game endings.Good moment in attack was changed with tottaly brainless desicion in the next one. This will get you beat.


Our 2022-2024 NT wont be good defensive team.

We can bring Normantas/D.Giedraitis that will get Zemaitis role or Sedekerskis in Echodas place it doesnt fix alot. We have what we have right now Kemzura and Maskvytis repeats that again and again.

But can we play smarter game endings? yes for sure.Thats why i want same 9 main players back,that went through that pain in those endings and should be one year smarter and mentally stronger.

No better coach exist than painfull experience.

btw Ulanovas is not candidate,he is 100% lock. It will depend more if Ulanovas will want to play but not will he make team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
never saw inexperienced rookies being some elite defenders.Defence is not just speed,lenghts or so on. To be good in defence without experience in that level its very difficult and we gonna 3 inexperienced kids who never even defended such level players ale be our stoppers ? jeazz where such fan comes

You did see at least one. There are not many of them but there are some young guns who can fix many problems by themselves. Garuba was one of them. He still is very young actually but you are right about the level of competition. A really low level league like LKL shouldnt have defenders of this caliber. One or two good defenders wouldnt be bad for this Lithuanian team though.
 
LOL. I would suggest to ignore the madness.

Lietuva 2022

Jokubaitis,Velicka,Kalnietis
Grigonis,Normantas
Ulanovas,Butkevicius,
Sedekerskis,Tubelis,Skucas
Sabonis,Valanciunas


Coach Maskvytis 3rd asistant and teams psychologist J.Maciulis for toughen up our players before games.

Kalnietis in playing coach role that will share his experience with 2 upcomming PG.

I would add Brazdeikis but he will not be interested playing in eurobasket.Maybe he will come for 2024 Olympic summer like all canadian/americans players does.

I added few players that have balls and can play tough nose defence. When in Day 1 of eurobasket 2022 Doncic gonna start scoring too much Skucas gonna put his ass on the ground from profilactic stand point.

When nothing works from basketball stand point im putting Skucas+Normantas tandem for few minutes to change atmosphere of the game.

I got alergic from super soft pussy character shooters like Giedraitis,Bendzius,Kuzminskas,Masiulis after watching them last 2 weeks.
 
dinosour expert haha you really dont have life dont you :) jeazas this men is living in this forum

when did i write that 1,5 year ago? so you going through this forum and reading old news ? Ok got only half roster right so?

but still dont saw your student kids on ltu 2022 roster :) Name was diffrent but players werent kids,coaches choosen mature dudes like most coaches does if they building winning NT.


Do i need to find and copy your predictions about born 1998-2002 ltu youngsters in 2022 roster?

Men cant win argument in todays date ,so goes back in time and bring 1 year old prediction here and forgets that he himself missed even more :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
2023 world cup when close game comes i want to see such lineup in last 4 minutes of games

Grigonis,Brazdeikis,Butkevicius,Ulanovas,Sabonis and switch everything in defence with good size and mobile players.

Obviuosly we cant play that lineup big minutes because of lack of size in PF position and we need real Pg in game progress,but finishing games Grigonis,Brazdeikis is simply better both defensively and offensively than inexperienced Jokubaitis . Rokas still need 1-2 years experience to be making rock solid pg type desicions in most game endings.

By 2025 Jokubaitis will play 30min in NT,but now still not there in desicion making under pressure

If Brazdeikis will have one of his wild bad shooting games then Jokubaitis IN instead of him in game endings.

But dont wanna see them both at same time in game endings.Too much inexperienced emotional youth brain in desicion making positions in most important moments in game.They did too manny brainless/wild desicions in 2022 endings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't mind to see such line-up, but just a reminder - Jokubaitis delivered against Spain in the knock out stage of EB, while Grigonis didn't (also Grigonis didn't deliver against Slovenia in 2021 OQ). The odds hasn't been in favor to hype Grigonis (who also having wild up and downs in EL too ATM), Jokubaitis is not where I would like him to be defensively yet (and maybe will never be, who knows), but he's not a black hole defensively. Jasikevicius throws him in as more reliable defensive player than Lapro for example.

Grigonis,Brazdeikis,Butkevicius,Ulanovas,Sabonis looks pretty good, but I would prefer Jokuibaitis creativity, passing and slashing presence in the key moments. Grigonis tends to struggle to beat physical defense and not always able to split the D (thus taking some wild step back jimmy), while Brazdeikis primarily good for ISO offense and not natural decision maker with the ball. This line-up would be left without reliable creator generally. But it does not irritate me generally, cause the size is great. If Grigonis splits the D he can surely make a right decision. He would be an elite EL player if had a bit more toughness and athleticism.
 
I wonder what's Kemzura cooking for upcoming windows. At first I was pissed NT left without head coach, but when I watched Kemzura's interview...Damn, dude's into that seriously. He even brought B. Matkevicius home. Kemzura seems to be taking this extremely focused and will do that job.

What does he have though? The list should come out soon, kinda expect some surprises, but it should be something like that I guess:

Velicka, Kariniauskas, Zemaitis
Normantas, Girdziunas
Kuzminskas, Radzevicius
Kulboka, Bendzius, Orelikas
Echodas, Miniotas, Geben


The surprise would come if he would invite one of Murauskas, Rubstavicius. This would mean Kemzura wants not only to win, but to make an impact to the NT long term.

PS1: Too bad we can't have D. Giedraitis, A. Tubelis, Sirvydis, A. Marciulionis. Those 4 to me are next youngsters to make NT. The closest cases to the NT from young guys. And we can't test them in windows unfortunately...It's funny that all three

PS2: Oh, and I forgot Blazevic. IMO, it would be interesting to see how he looks today. Vilnius finally has some shit to offer :D D. Giedraitis, A. Tubelis, Sirvydis, A. Marciulionis, Blazevic.
 
I don't mind to see such line-up, but just a reminder - Jokubaitis delivered against Spain in the knock out stage of EB, while Grigonis didn't (also Grigonis didn't deliver against Slovenia in 2021 OQ). The odds hasn't been in favor to hype Grigonis (who also having wild up and downs in EL too ATM), Jokubaitis is not where I would like him to be defensively yet (and maybe will never be, who knows), but he's not a black hole defensively. Jasikevicius throws him in as more reliable defensive player than Lapro for example.

Grigonis,Brazdeikis,Butkevicius,Ulanovas,Sabonis looks pretty good, but I would prefer Jokuibaitis creativity, passing and slashing presence in the key moments. Grigonis tends to struggle to beat physical defense and not always able to split the D (thus taking some wild step back jimmy), while Brazdeikis primarily good for ISO offense and not natural decision maker with the ball. This line-up would be left without reliable creator generally. But it does not irritate me generally, cause the size is great. If Grigonis splits the D he can surely make a right decision. He would be an elite EL player if had a bit more toughness and athleticism.


One of Jokubaitis/Brazdeikis can be in crunch time,but not both at PG and SG at desicion making positions. 3 mature dudes will hide one youngster wild desicions,but with 2 crazy inexperienced desicion makers team gonna beat themselfs.Thast what happend to our NT 2022.

Brazdeikis delivered against Spain in last 5minutes and overtime, Jokubaitis missed last half open shot againts Spain , in same way like yesterday versus Zalgiris that would have won both games.

Grigonis
was by far best ltu guard in eurobasket 2022. That Scariola put on him his best defender and put box in 1 on him only shows that he was affraid of Grigonis.

Scariola was risking going under picks on Jokubaitis,Brazdeikis,Kuzminskas,Lekavicius giving half open long shots in order to shut the lane and do not let Grigonis make desicion with the ball. Force other ltu guards do desicions.

Thats why that group scored well in that game and not in other games.Because Spain defence decided they gonna risk on them and make ltu big 3 life as difficult as possible putting all attention on them.

When other 5 teams was playing fair defence on everyone same way we saw who is best NT players.

In last 4 minutes of close game you need not speed or creativity,but expierence and mentally strongest dudes out there with no fear in eyes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Kemzura picked his pieces for upcoming window. Surprise is that Kulboka out, but since there are Kuz and Benzius there's no need of that kind of player. Other than that Kemzura took all the best available I guess. Aside the wins, my emphasis on Velicka and Blazevic. IMO, only 2 guys who are relevant for NT long at least a little bit. All other guys (Kuz aside) have no pedigree of real NT level.

Again, it's pity we can't integrate 00 and 02 studs here - Sirvydis, D. Giedraitis, Tubelis, A. Marciulionis. They would make much sense for such level and to have an opportunity to get their feet wet.

I see that untalented 1996 generation (the one that was so trashy that it made D. Sabonis having no medals in Youth competition) pieces are nearly the core of B NT guard section - Normantas, Zemaitis. Not that I hate them, as they are good guys who plays with energy, but in a way a bad timing for us. Like for example in few years 1999 generation studs in Velicka, I. Sargiunas will be way better. They are much more talented. In a way current B national team is still dreadful testify of our creepy stretch of horrible guards....Even the same Kariniauskas kinda sucks. Basically 1987-1998 is super horrible stretch for us in terms of guards (we produced only 2 real deal guards in Grigonis, Lekavicius). Basically 10 creepy years. Soon we'll have better guards both in A and B teams.

https://twitter.com/ltu_basketball/status/1585996305012183040
 
You were telling same storries how 1984-1986 guards was very limited and predicting how much better upcomming guards will be ... now in 10 years was only 2 good guards ?

Those 1984-1986 player were better in winning basketball games and it wasnt because of basketball tallent.It was because they were very strong in other elements and most main player peaked at same time.

To be elite at basketball raw tallent is only 25%. Without strong body,strong mentality,smart brain and winners character...just basketball tallent will let you be like eurocup player.


Best players now have strong combination of all elements because they needed to beat ridiculous competion to become what they become. Just physical tallent and skill is not good enough anymore.

Players have to have everything in one body to be elite now and going further.

Thats why all those guessing games is useless.

Npbody knows what kinda character,what brain those upcomming kids will have.How they will handle pressure and all those things.

Is one thing to guess those ridiculous athletes from nba where even blind can see they are special/freaks ,but try to guess white non freakish athletic dudes careers good luck :)


You predicting how much future will be better as always :) History somehow tells us it wont.With every decade is getting worse and worse NT result wise. Because competion getting better and better and with very limited resources of 3million population compare to opponnets to win medal will be harder and harder.

Its not jungle times anymore like till 90s with basketball academies and so on. Most countries have similiar basketball schools now and if one country has 3 millions and other 20million to find diamonds guess who gonna find more?

Untill ltu basketball will have elite guard again by that point ltu basketball wont have elite bigs anymore most likely . To win medal we need both at same time. In other word we need golden generation that elite players would be born in max +- 3-4 years time frame to be multiple medal winning NT again.

Its unlikely to work if elite big is born in 1992 and elite guard in 2000.Those generation players dont have same ready to win now period.

Argentina wouldnt have won so much if Ginolbili,Scola,Nocioni,Prigioni wouldnt be born with only 2-3 years from each other.Same with Jaska/Siska/Kauke/Macas/Songa generation 2-3 years diffrence from each other.Same to win now period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You were telling same storries how 1984-1986 guards was very limited and predicting how much better upcomming guards will be ... now in 10 years was only 2 good guards ?

I was. My prediction that the declining trend - Marciulionis, Kurtinaitis > Jasikevicius, Siskauskas > Kalnietis, Seibutis - had to end with Kalnietis, Seibutis (the bar is not high), but today we can conclude that it didn't happen, it continued with > Grigonis, Lekavicius. My point was that bb country as Lithuania can't be mediocre for many decades, specially when we had elite backcourt players for many decades previously - Paulauskas, Jovaisa, Chomicius, Kurtinaitis, Marciulionis, Jasikevicius, Siskauskas, Macijauskas and even Kalnietis was playing like elite guard in NT. It's like 4-5 decades in a row. I don't believe we can settle without elite backcourt players for upcoming 4 decades after having such historical data. Elite players should come.

21yo Jokubaitis is playing well in Barselona. 23yo Brazdeikis overall had a nice EB for his age. I still believe we will brake this declining trend this decade and will have something better than Kalnietis, Seibutis duo in the guard line (IMO, we will have the best depth of guards historically).

Those 1984-1986 player were better in winning basketball games and it wasnt because of basketball tallent.It was because they were very strong in other elements.

To be elite at basketball raw tallent is only 25%. Without strong body,strong mentality,smart brain and winners character...just basketball tallent will let you be like eurocup player.


Best players now have strong combination of all elements because they needed to beat ridiculous competion to become what they become. Just physical tallent and skill is not good enough anymore.

Players have to have everything in one body to be elite now and going further.

Thats why all those guessing games is useless.

Npbody knows what kinda character,what brain those upcomming kids will have.How they will handle pressure and all those things.

Is one thing to guess those ridiculous athletes from nba where even blind can see they are special/freaks ,but try to guess white non freakish athletic dudes careers good luck :)

With that I more or less agree. But it's not easier with NBA kids too. Many athletic, talented kids busted. And why wouldn't new gutsy players with great characters re-appear? We'll see. IMO, our BB school is very spot on to develop "right characters".



You predicting how much future will be better as always :) History somehow tells us it wont.With every decade is getting worse and worse NT result wise. Because competion getting better and better and with very limited resources of 3million population compare to opponnets to win medal will be harder and harder.

Its not jungle times anymore like till 90s with basketball academies and so on. Most countries have similiar basketball schools now and if one country has 3 millions and other 20million to find diamonds guess who gonna find more?

Untill ltu basketball will have elite guard again by that point ltu basketball wont have elite bigs anymore most likely and so on. To win medal you need both at same time. In other word we need golden generation that elite players would be born in max +- 3-4 years time frame.

It wont work if elite big is born in 1992 and elite guard in 2000.Those generation dont have same ready to win now period.

My prediction now is that we are going to be better in 20's than we were in 10's (even early version), but the competition will be tougher. With that I agree, but wouldn't overemphasize that. Was Spain 2019 and 2022 super unbelievably stacked with talent to win it all? Hell no! Nor was was Argentina in 2019 to make a great run. Simply those teams head the right pieces and great team concept/working ethics/coaching. Specially 2022 Spain was nothing special. They didn't have a single world class star. Just had elite PG by European standards, couple of great role players (Willy, Garuba, Rudy and such) and, BOOM!, they have everything they need to win.

Despite the decline we had competitive team. With more luck maybe we could talk more optimistically about 2017-2022 stretch even today (remembering all these close 2019 and 2022 games against elite opponents). And I think we can have way better rosters in 2023-2030 compared to 2017-2022.

Regarding the need of elite big we have to remember that Sabonis is 26yo and most likely will be available for the rest of the decade. Besides, in 00's we had no elite bigs, but it was golden generation. We had good defensive bigs as role players - Javtokas, E. Zukauskas. Our frontline with Tubelis, Krivas, Murauskas (+ Sabonis) should be superior to 00's, IMO. At least I tend to think so. All three marked players are NBA borderliners.

Basically I agree that it's harder and harder to compete, but it doesn't mean we can't have a great generation coming. We still have much bigger passion for the game and advantages that only bb nations have. Look at our Youth results this summer. We were second best NT after Spain in Europe.
 
Back
Top