U
usagre2
Guest
Pedja's peak was higher than Bodiroga's. But his peak was very very short and the rest of the years he was 50-60% of those 2 years in Sacramento. And clutch was ALWAYS an issue. He never had that. Doesn't make him a bad player, just lacks the X factor. Bodiroga maintained peak level of performance for a very long time, and was always the X factor when it mattered.. He never decided to go to NBA, it was his choice. We don't know how he would've played, we can only assume. The only way we can compare them is along each other, when they played together. In those instances Bodiroga was clearly better and more valuable to his team.
Again, when this stupid debate started few days ago I wrote Bodiroga is for ME, second best player after Drazen from Ex-Yu because of the reasons I stated.. No one really has to agree with that, it won't change my mind.
That's fine I am not trying to change your mind. I was just giving my opinion. I am just glad that someone like Bjelica doesn't share Bodirogas mentality and is willing to test himself against the best.