• Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience
  • Since we moved our URL please clear your browsers history and cookies and try logging in again. Thank you and sorry for any inconvenience

Euroleague 2012/13 teams

  • Thread starter Thread starter pohani komarac2
  • Start date Start date
JPF,

Man, that was quite a post. :p

Attendance should correlate with clubs revenues , given the revenues exclude money gifted to club by sponsors/owners. Clubs revenues comes mainly from 1) tickets 2) TV-rights 3) ads

Tickets have a direct link with attendance, TV-rights and ads related to interest of general public ( could be seen as a base of a pyramid with top of it being attendance )

I wish we had the numbers as I am sure f.e. in comparison with let's say from year 1998, those would most likely indicate that aggregated EL revenues went up mostly in countries for which our perception of their national competition improved within the same period, such as Spain, Germany, Russia (did increase compared to Perm and Saratov, although in % of the budget they do remain miserable), Lithuania, while those decreased in Italy, France, Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia just as a common perception of those leagues did in the same period along with teams revenues as those leagues are more or less idle or even stagnating.

EL revenues comes as a percents of clubs TV rights - clubs sells EL games TV rights to local channels , EL takes some percents of it.

Now check MTA TV rights figures : 2.8M with the Russian numbers for the last year : 375k ( CSKA ), 100k ( Khimki ) . Keep in mind that Russian numbers include also broadcasting VTB league games.

So we're talking about weak Israeli league giving EL nearly 10 times profit then the strong Russian league.

Surely pure clubs budgets numbers over the last decade shifted from Italy, France, Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia to richer regions like Spain, Russia, Turkey, but it doesn't mean EL profits increased as a result.

I guess it's exactly the opposite. IIRC Russian EL games are broadcast by NTV Plus : prepaid satellite channel with tiny 500k of subscribers for 140M country.
 
belive me I would

if we lose club in EL because bad rasults i don't care, but euroleague = shit!

EL sucks in giving strict transparent set of rules for everyone to follow. Hell even Hammurabi figured it out some 4000 years ago.

I personally don't want results based only EL: it will kill all Balkan & Lithuanian players factories for the sake of money rich clubs that only buy players . EL will earn in quality for a season or two and then it will collapse into European D-League.

UEFA Champions league picked up the same path : champions route weak clubs are given a priority over strong non-champion clubs just for the sake of expanding Champions league geography over football quality ( and results)
 
I'm sportsman and to all off us only thing that should mather is sport results. If Croatia don't deserve spot because sport results I can get over it. Point is if Germany deserves 2 spots (still don't know where that come from) then 1st and 2nd German team should play EL, not 5th. If Spain deserves 4spots, then it's first 4 teams that should play EL not 9th.

I can't help my self then use dirty language about it, neither for last year Bayern Euorcup WC or this year Zvezda, or last year Cibona EL WC....it's all undeserved. For evrey real sportsman only prise he wannts to get is on court. Evrything else is bullshit. EL is just not fair competition and has nothing to do with SPORT
 
JPF,

Man, that was quite a post. :p

Attendance should correlate with clubs revenues , given the revenues exclude money gifted to club by sponsors/owners. Clubs revenues comes mainly from 1) tickets 2) TV-rights 3) ads

Tickets have a direct link with attendance, TV-rights and ads related to interest of general public ( could be seen as a base of a pyramid with top of it being attendance )



EL revenues comes as a percents of clubs TV rights - clubs sells EL games TV rights to local channels , EL takes some percents of it.

Now check MTA TV rights figures : 2.8M with the Russian numbers for the last year : 375k ( CSKA ), 100k ( Khimki ) . Keep in mind that Russian numbers include also broadcasting VTB league games.

So we're talking about weak Israeli league giving EL nearly 10 times profit then the strong Russian league.

Surely pure clubs budgets numbers over the last decade shifted from Italy, France, Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia to richer regions like Spain, Russia, Turkey, but it doesn't mean EL profits increased as a result.

I guess it's exactly the opposite. IIRC Russian EL games are broadcast by NTV Plus : prepaid satellite channel with tiny 500k of subscribers for 140M country.

Actually, for almost all big clubs in all big sports leagues, the sponsors are the vast majority of the income and not ticket sales. In the NBA it sure is that way for every team. And for the biggest teams (only a small group of them) the TV deals.

The ticket sales might be huge for Maccabi, but that's nothing for most clubs. The whole attendance thing is just a ruse. The real issue with that is this,

1. Having big new arenas generates revenues, not through the ticket sales mainly, but through the marketing, sponsors and the sales and fees.

2. Having the big new arena looks pretty on TV and having it filled looks pretty on TV. Giving the illusion that it is a super good and important league. Like MLS in USA, with all its big shiny new arenas, that are usually packed with fans. It gives the illusion on TV that the league is really good and really important.

And in that example too, almost the whole league revenue stream comes from sponsors.

3. The arenas are the way to get fans in there and to buy the merchandise and pay for parking, etc.

The ticket sales revenue is a drop in the bucket for most big clubs in most big leagues.

It's the sponsor money that always dominates, and after that, for a small group of clubs it is the TV deals. Attendance is very minor thing in importance in terms of revenue.

Just realize that NBA fans all over the world have this idea and perception that if they watch a pro game it must be played in a big, full arena, otherwise they call it "minor league". That's why Euroleague is concerned about arenas and attendance. It's for image and perception, and not for actual revenue.

That's why the NBA counts tickets sold as in-game attendance. To give the perception and impression around the world that the N BA is super popular. To give European basketball fans the perception that the NBA has huge attendance numbers.

When you see game after game on NBA league pass where there will be no more than 5,000 fans in an NBA arena. But the "official attendance figure" will be listed at 18,000. That way, whenever someone looks up the attendance figures, they say, oh wow look how popular the NBA is.

The Euroleague just hasn't figured out that same trick yet, but I am sure that they will eventually.

Regardless, the CSKA model, of the vast amount of revenue coming from sponsors, is the exact same model that almost every major sports club in the world operates by. It's not by attendance.

I'm sportsman and to all off us only thing that should mather is sport results. If Croatia don't deserve spot because sport results I can get over it. Point is if Germany deserves 2 spots (still don't know where that come from) then 1st and 2nd German team should play EL, not 5th. If Spain deserves 4spots, then it's first 4 teams that should play EL not 9th.

I can't help my self then use dirty language about it, neither for last year Bayern Euorcup WC or this year Zvezda, or last year Cibona EL WC....it's all undeserved. For evrey real sportsman only prise he wannts to get is on court. Evrything else is bullshit. EL is just not fair competition and has nothing to do with SPORT

I am with you on this. It's not even a debate. Giving ALBA a direct wildcard place in the regular season is ridiculous. I don't care what their attendance is, what arena they play in, what market they play in, that they are the most historic club probably of Germany, that they play the Mavs and Dirk in preseason, that they have some results counting Eurocup points system...whatever.

The fact is they finished 5th in the German League, which is nothing more than a mediocre European league. So the 2nd placed German team has to go through the qualification stage. Plus, this means Germany has 2 places in the regular season, and a third in the qualification stage.

How does this make sense when they ranked the German League in the #7 place in the league rankings?

So how does the #3 ranked Greek League get less places than the #7 ranked league?

How does ALBA deserve a direct wildcard more than Galatasaray, Cantu, UNICS?

How does ALBA deserve this place more than the 2, 3, 4 German clubs?

The bottom line is some of this stuff from Euroleague is totally ridiculous, and this is just the most absurd example. There is no legit reason for ALBA to get that regular season place. NONE. And the attendance things is totally irrelevant. Because Galatasary would have even better attendance probably and they didn't get the place.

The points system argument does not hold water either. If they were really concerned about the performance of teams, then surely Valencia or Bilbao or UNICS, some club like that would have gotten the place.

Let's just say, using this arena and attendance and results excuse argument, Bilbao has a new 10,000 seat arena, they just made the top 8 of Euroleague, they have a substantially larger budget than ALBA does, they made the finals of ACB in the previous year, and before that the finals of Eurocup.

They have terrific fan support and attendance. They have a much better team than ALBA. They play in a much tougher league than ALBA. They finished in 6th place in the ACB, which is obviously a much better result than 5th place in the BBL..........

By any way you compare it or look at it, Bilbao is way more deserving of a place than ALBA, even if you use all these excuses like attendance, new arena, etc.

You may say the clubs are not paying to get their places, but I think they are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sportsman and to all off us only thing that should matter is sport results. If Croatia don't deserve spot because sport results I can get over it. Point is if Germany deserves 2 spots (still don't know where that come from) then 1st and 2nd German team should play EL, not 5th. If Spain deserves 4spots, then it's first 4 teams that should play EL not 9th.

I can't help my self then use dirty language about it, neither for last year Bayern Euorcup WC or this year Zvezda, or last year Cibona EL WC....it's all undeserved. For every real sportsman only price he wants to get is on court. Everything else is bullshit. EL is just not fair competition and has nothing to do with SPORT

Let's leave the question of pro sport being a sport or a business. I think it's both, but it deserves its own thread.

Going with pure sport: how do you measure sport results to determinate who deserves EL spot or who doesn't ?

Taking national champs and runners up you ignore sport results of teams playing in strong leagues ( e.g. Unicaja)

Taking in account only past European performance ( 3-year, 5-year cycle ? ) as a measure , we have a problem of measuring sport results of teams playing in different competitions : EL & Eurocup ( e.g. Alba with more wins then Bamberg, who regularly beat Alba on national level)
 
Regardless, the CSKA model, of the vast amount of revenue coming from sponsors, is the exact same model that almost every major sports club in the world operates by. It's not by attendance.

The good news for the world: there are major sports club who actually generate money instead of wasting it CSKA-style.
 
Continuing to process JPF extra looooong post said:
Logic is pretty simple (long term in case when not mentioned differently), strong NC's influence overall team's revenue, due to the larger amount of games played to probably the same extent as euroleague does if not even more (I admit my "10% increase in NC revenues will lead to 10+ increase in EL" argument/elasticity, might drop here due to it, but agregated incomes of the both are still closely related with each other), competitiveness achieved without A licences increases investments (non-revenue related) in NC as a whole, increases the ammount of fans due to local patriotism and number of kids playing basketball accordingly as well as improving the systems supported both with more expertise and finances to educate those into talented bball players.
Competitiveness increases attendance and ticket sales along the interest for the game and TV ratings. TV revenues are dependant on the ratings, sport section competition between various sports as well as various competitions within the same sport - as those substitutes (from the broadcaster point of view) are closely related, increase in TV rights for NBA, NC and the cup will lead to logical increase of demand for euroleague TV rights as well.
F.e. French LNB as well as French cup going from (imaginary) 1 million from TV rights to 3 makes euroleague at 1 million that much more hell of a deal, leading to increase in TV rights eventually. Two substitutes price rising to 500%, increase the demand for the 3rd one. Basic economics.

It's hard to make any point without actual numbers ( attendance, revenues ). Attendance alone can be tricky as hell , we may develop complicated theories why club X has better attendance then club Y, but it may turn out that club X attendance secret is just in a bigger parking lot.

I'll tried to map out factors that may influence attendance in this thread. Feel free to add Olimpija as an example.

As for " increase in NC revenues will lead to increase in EL": to be honest my logic tells that NC and EL are more competitors then partners : they compete better weekly game assignments, they compete for better time on TV , they compete for audience .

It's hard to imagine anybody but hardcore fans going to both NC and EL games ( twice a week ) usually people pick one game that seems more interesting ( or better fits their schedule )

For Israeli league, EL is usually a winner ( 11k vs ~2k for NC ). I'd like to see ACB league attendance numbers/TV coverage to make compression, but judging from internet traffic ACB.com has a rank of 390 in Spain, Euroleague.net in Spain is ranked only 28,553

Note that top Euroleague.net visitors come from rather weak national leagues : Greece , Lithuania , Serbia, Israel .

So it seems like the opposite: an increase in NC popularity leads to decrease in EL popularity and vice versa.
 
JPF,

Man, that was quite a post. :p
Well, by now you know I get carried away... typing without control. Tried to keep it short, believe it or not :)

Attendance should correlate with clubs revenues , given the revenues exclude money gifted to club by sponsors/owners. Clubs revenues comes mainly from 1) tickets 2) TV-rights 3) ads

Tickets have a direct link with attendance, TV-rights and ads related to interest of general public ( could be seen as a base of a pyramid with top of it being attendance )

EL revenues comes as a percents of clubs TV rights - clubs sells EL games TV rights to local channels , EL takes some percents of it.

Now check MTA TV rights figures : 2.8M with the Russian numbers for the last year : 375k ( CSKA ), 100k ( Khimki ) . Keep in mind that Russian numbers include also broadcasting VTB league games.

So we're talking about weak Israeli league giving EL nearly 10 times profit then the strong Russian league.

Surely pure clubs budgets numbers over the last decade shifted from Italy, France, Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia to richer regions like Spain, Russia, Turkey, but it doesn't mean EL profits increased as a result.

I guess it's exactly the opposite. IIRC Russian EL games are broadcast by NTV Plus : prepaid satellite channel with tiny 500k of subscribers for 140M country.
What you're saying is all true. Attendance and revenue are closely connected and as much as my rant seemed entirely against Uleb, I do aknowledge they've did what they could in that aspect. Rise of an average attendance in EL is partly their achievement with 5k and 10k capacity rules, which we can understand why they're not sticking to it, yet by that Uleb is prooving even more undecisive changing their vision and rules interpretation year after year. I won't claim Uleb's intention is to destroy european bball, that's childish, I know there are people wanting the best, yet... they really got it wrong with their competition system and marketing aproach, either by being a cheapshots when outsourcing strategists or by not being able to coprehend the entire long term picture.

Are you absolutely sure about the clubs selling the TV rights with EL only grabbing few %? I admit I never came across that.

I personally don't want results based only EL: it will kill all Balkan & Lithuanian players factories for the sake of money rich clubs that only buy players . EL will earn in quality for a season or two and then it will collapse into European D-League.
Please do not opose the result based system because of us :) I on the other hand don't believe those factories woud collapse, on the opposite. Having Cibona in euroleague in times when Zadar and Split deserved it more for a whole decade was almost more deprimental to Croatian basketball than having to fight for euroleague spot imo.
Those clubs will never get shut down as people there love basketball, few seasons without euroleague only means recuperation-reorganisation phase, Lithuanians would get an incredible championship finals with one place leading to EL and let's say another to qualies, result wise I wouldn't be too worried about them (especialy Žalgiris with such attendance), Partizan has an enormous talent pool and hordes of supporters, Zvezda with Pešić has all the tools to challenge that, Split and Zadar have basicaly all but money, two long term serious teams might right now exist in Zagreb -> worst thing that can happen to them is Uleb deciding about the participants of euroleague instead of them on court - believe it's likewise in majority of other championships.

I believe majority of supporters of "developmental clubs" as pohani, or me, aren't too worried about such result oriented system. And even if Olimpija doesn't recover and get back to euroleague, sure I'll be dissapointed, yet when they do, prooving things on court is what sport is and makes all of it that more sweeter.

UEFA Champions league picked up the same path : champions route weak clubs are given a priority over strong non-champion clubs just for the sake of expanding Champions league geography over football quality ( and results)
Very much true and long term profitable for them. And that's one more mistake from Uleb they've been doing so far. Czech's might not be dominating last few years in clubs basketball, but it's impossible to tell they wouldn't in the future and imo noone has the right to decide that behind a desk instead on court. With the "Uleb way" of runing things Greece and Turkey maybee wouldn't even be one of the powerhouses if they wouldn't be given a legit chance to compete, same thing for Yugoslavia even a bit further in the past.
It sounds a long shot, I admit, yet looking at Macedonians and Finns at eurobasket, basketball obviously isn't as unpopular as majority assumes for other countries, qualifications for euroleague have to aknowledge that.

I also aknowledge some hybrid (not to some extreme extent) criteria when it comes to euroleague, as long as it supports what's going on on court.

It's hard to make any point without actual numbers ( attendance, revenues ). Attendance alone can be tricky as hell , we may develop complicated theories why club X has better attendance then club Y, but it may turn out that club X attendance secret is just in a bigger parking lot.

I'll tried to map out factors that may influence attendance in this thread. Feel free to add Olimpija as an example.

As for " increase in NC revenues will lead to increase in EL": to be honest my logic tells that NC and EL are more competitors then partners : they compete better weekly game assignments, they compete for better time on TV , they compete for audience .

It's hard to imagine anybody but hardcore fans going to both NC and EL games ( twice a week ) usually people pick one game that seems more interesting ( or better fits their schedule )
I will add Olimpija as an example, thank's for reminding me, did want that in the past, yet somehow didn't manage to.

I don't think they're competitors as basicaly euroleague should be no.1 and perceived by such without much competition or the club playing in it, while deciding on attending the NC game is more or less based on opponent, or national championhips strenght.

From the perspective of a TV broadcaster, they are substitutes, as they've got fix ammount of broadcasting time to spend and than can f.e. decide which part of bball they'll fight for (NC, cup, euroleague, NBA... over here ven ACB and eurocup). That influences TV rights and partly sponsor demand as they want to be seen, no matter what.

Short term you've got it right as far as fan is concerned, yet long term it's basicaly just a matter of getting people of getting used to attending games (I'll write down more in the upper thread you've mentioned), when you reach enough of that population basical both games can be packed - as various ACB teams are showcasing.

For Israeli league, EL is usually a winner ( 11k vs ~2k for NC ). I'd like to see ACB league attendance numbers/TV coverage to make compression, but judging from internet traffic ACB.com has a rank of 390 in Spain, Euroleague.net in Spain is ranked only 28,553

Note that top Euroleague.net visitors come from rather weak national leagues : Greece , Lithuania , Serbia, Israel .

So it seems like the opposite: an increase in NC popularity leads to decrease in EL popularity and vice versa.
Serbians, Lithuanians, Greeks obviously love basketball in big part due to their NT's and you guys are crazy about Maccabi obviously :) Otherwise if we exclude Russia as their cash spending probably isn't on pair with the popularity of sport and GB, USA (which imo consists to a large degree of Greeks, Lithuanians, Turks and co.) I don't find those rating that strange (apart from Austria being there and Slovenia not :D ).

Just as a speculative example, as much as I understand it's a heresy to some to speculate Maccabi would ever lose it's supremacy :D, but let's say f.e. Hapoel Jerusalem with their new arena, some luck with a decent team, some decent sponsor starts producing revenue enabling team to 10 million € budget. Strenght of Israeli league would increase and if given a chance at qualification EL's popularity would as well.

While I can't understand a theory principle where a market competition would actualy comparatively decrease popularity or demand, principles of "decided behind the desk" do suffocate popularity as well as demand for the product. Free market liberal theory vs. socialist state run economy at it's best.

Did try to keep it short this time even if not as succesfull. :)
 
Let's leave the question of pro sport being a sport or a business. I think it's both, but it deserves its own thread.
Going with pure sport: how do you measure sport results to determinate who deserves EL spot or who doesn't ?

Taking national champs and runners up you ignore sport results of teams playing in strong leagues ( e.g. Unicaja)

Taking in account only past European performance ( 3-year, 5-year cycle ? ) as a measure , we have a problem of measuring sport results of teams playing in different competitions : EL & Eurocup ( e.g. Alba with more wins then Bamberg, who regularly beat Alba on national level)

are you jordi?:p

i don't give damn what is pro sport. it's sport, and let gredey bastards make money based on sport resulats. but i wannt to folow fair play sport. they can make bilions out of it, i don't care. but give me fair competition

it's verys simple. you calculate each federation clubs sucses and give each league spots for euroleague. then let clubs qualify trough national competitons............otherwise it's all pointles and closed league

what's the point for valencia now? why their owners and sponsor invested money when they can't pick their prise they deserved on court? why would any player wannt to play for them??? and so on....

it's all bullshit and you know it

a,b, c, d or znj licese, tv ratings, wc, big market....... it's all capitalistic bullshit and has nothing to do with sports spirit. for me, as i consider myself sportsman untill euroligue becomes fair play league that promotes sport spirit is just big jordi's crap. and personaly i just can't understand there is sportsman here that supports this???? just can't get how can somebody that plays sport and wannts to compete can appruve unfair league?
 
are you jordi?:p

i don't give damn what is pro sport. it's sport, and let gredey bastards make money based on sport resulats. but i wannt to folow fair play sport. they can make bilions out of it, i don't care. but give me fair competition

it's verys simple. you calculate each federation clubs sucses and give each league spots for euroleague. then let clubs qualify trough national competitons............otherwise it's all pointles and closed league

what's the point for valencia now? why their owners and sponsor invested money when they can't pick their prise they deserved on court? why would any player wannt to play for them??? and so on....

it's all bullshit and you know it

a,b, c, d or znj licese, tv ratings, wc, big market....... it's all capitalistic bullshit and has nothing to do with sports spirit. for me, as i consider myself sportsman untill euroligue becomes fair play league that promotes sport spirit is just big jordi's crap. and personaly i just can't understand there is sportsman here that supports this???? just can't get how can somebody that plays sport and wannts to compete can appruve unfair league?

You know, we ( me included ) are so used to bash Jordi, so we automatically blast him for every action, no matter if there are better alternatives.

Let's implement the system you suggested. Each win in EL/EC = 2 pts, loss = 1 pts , going up each phase ( Regular->Top16->Playoffs->Final Four ->Final ) gives 1 pts bonus . All is based on sport results and fair , right ?


That's what we get for 3 year cycle per country:

CountryPoints
Spain131
Greece124
Israel116
Italy109
Russia104
Adriatic76
Germany74
Turkey73
Lithuania72
Czech70
Poland55
France46
Belgium31
Ukraine29
Latvia28
Bulgaria8
Holland8

[
[

The total sum of points = 1154, so if we divide it by 24 ( places in Euroleague ) , we'll get fair amount of places for each country, right ?
1154/24 = 48 . So gaining 48 points gives a country a place in EL.

That's what we get:
CountryFair places in EL
Spain2.7292
Greece2.5833
Israel2.4167
Italy2.2708
Russia2.1667
Adriatic1.5833
Germany1.5417
Turkey1.5208
Lithuania1.5000
Czech1.4583
Poland1.1458
France0.9583
Belgium0.6458
Ukraine0.6042
Latvia0.5833
Holland0.1667
Bulgaria0.1667

[

If we round up the numbers Spain, Greece deserved 3 places , Israel , Italy, Russia, Adriatic, Germany, Turkey, Lithuania - 2, Czech, Poland, France, Belgium - 1, Ukraine, Latvia - sorry no places left

Basically ultra-fair system will throw out power houses like Caja Laboral and Valencia , just to get Maccabi Ashdod , Panionios and Nymburk . Adriatic will get 2 places instead of the current 3+1.

Do you really want such system ?
 
You know, we ( me included ) are so used to bash Jordi, so we automatically blast him for every action, no matter if there are better alternatives.

Let's implement the system you suggested. Each win in EL/EC = 2 pts, loss = 1 pts , going up each phase ( Regular->Top16->Playoffs->Final Four ->Final ) gives 1 pts bonus . All is based on sport results and fair , right ?


That's what we get for 3 year cycle per country:

CountryPoints
Spain131
Greece124
Israel116
Italy109
Russia104
Adriatic76
Germany74
Turkey73
Lithuania72
Czech70
Poland55
France46
Belgium31
Ukraine29
Latvia28
Bulgaria8
Holland8

[
[

The total sum of points = 1154, so if we divide it by 24 ( places in Euroleague ) , we'll get fair amount of places for each country, right ?
1154/24 = 48 . So gaining 48 points gives a country a place in EL.

That's what we get:
CountryFair places in EL
Spain2.7292
Greece2.5833
Israel2.4167
Italy2.2708
Russia2.1667
Adriatic1.5833
Germany1.5417
Turkey1.5208
Lithuania1.5000
Czech1.4583
Poland1.1458
France0.9583
Belgium0.6458
Ukraine0.6042
Latvia0.5833
Holland0.1667
Bulgaria0.1667

[

If we round up the numbers Spain, Greece deserved 3 places , Israel , Italy, Russia, Adriatic, Germany, Turkey, Lithuania - 2, Czech, Poland, France, Belgium - 1, Ukraine, Latvia - sorry no places left

Basically ultra-fair system will throw out power houses like Caja Laboral and Valencia , just to get Maccabi Ashdod , Panionios and Nymburk . Adriatic will get 2 places instead of the current 3+1.

Do you really want such system ?

yes, fair system my fried.. that's only thing that mathers

and you can expend list, make uefa qualiys. why shouldn't holland club have right to play el? or 4th spanish isted of 9th?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes, fair system my fried.. that's only thing that mathers

and you can expend list, make uefa qualiys. why shouldn't holland club have right to play el? or 4th spanish isted of 9th?


I have to objection to Valencia playing EL instead of Unicaja, but to replace Caja Laboral with Maccabi Ashdod seems like a bad idea for both clubs.

Actually Ashdod refused to play EC, because they don't have 5k arena and due to budgets constrains ( their budget ~ 2M )

But let's say they Ashdod will play EL for the sake of fairness : to do so they need to take bank loans : for flights, to rent Yad Eliyahu for EL games, extra players salaries.

Next season Ashdod is financially devastated ( have no money to play even in Israel Top division ) and has a huge debt from EL season.

Caja Laboral plays EC, instead of EL : budgets drops, sponsors leave, players salaries rise ( everybody want to play EL, so to sign player you have to pay extra ), attendance drops as well. With all those problems Caja in unable to finish in ACB top4 : no EL next season too.

Next season Baskonia is just a middle table ACB team with the same middle table budget and attendance.

So the next season's result of such a swap : Ashdod is bankrupt, Caja Laboral isn't playing in EL anymore.
 
Joško Poljak Fan;709175 said:
Are you absolutely sure about the clubs selling the TV rights with EL only grabbing few %? I admit I never came across that.

I have a link , but it's in Hebrew : link

It's Israeli financial newspaper - Calcalist. I know Google translate sucks balls in Hebrew , so that's what is written there in short from:

EL budget ( 30M ) comes from clubs EL TV rights that clubs sell by themselves. 10 EL clubs gives EL 75% of its profit (BB: I guess majority of them A-licence clubs) , the rest 14 bring only 4M to EL profits, 280k per team.

Joško Poljak Fan;709175 said:
Please do not opose the result based system because of us :) I on the other hand don't believe those factories woud collapse, on the opposite. Having Cibona in euroleague in times when Zadar and Split deserved it more for a whole decade was almost more deprimental to Croatian basketball than having to fight for euroleague spot imo.
Those clubs will never get shut down as people there love basketball, few seasons without euroleague only means recuperation-reorganisation phase, Lithuanians would get an incredible championship finals with one place leading to EL and let's say another to qualies, result wise I wouldn't be too worried about them (especialy Žalgiris with such attendance), Partizan has an enormous talent pool and hordes of supporters, Zvezda with Pešić has all the tools to challenge that, Split and Zadar have basicaly all but money, two long term serious teams might right now exist in Zagreb -> worst thing that can happen to them is Uleb deciding about the participants of euroleague instead of them on court - believe it's likewise in majority of other championships.

I believe majority of supporters of "developmental clubs" as pohani, or me, aren't too worried about such result oriented system. And even if Olimpija doesn't recover and get back to euroleague, sure I'll be dissapointed, yet when they do, prooving things on court is what sport is and makes all of it that more sweeter.

The point that in results oriented system will not lead to Zadar playing instead of Cibona, it will simple erase Balkans from EL map.

Balkan clubs stress on developing players won't bring them far in "results system" , EL will belong to budget rich clubs . As a result young Balkan players won't get the same exposure and experience playing for top league as they have now.

EL should be some sort of government who sets laws , collects taxes , restraining the power of rich clubs and protects ( and help economically) weak clubs in the time of troubles.

In a global view , pure results oriented system is a wild capitalism , EL pumping money of successful clubs to corrupt mis-managed clubs is a wild socialism. I want something "in between", like "capitalism with a human face".

Judging from human history: that's the system that works well for everybody, both rich and poor.
 
I have to objection to Valencia playing EL instead of Unicaja, but to replace Caja Laboral with Maccabi Ashdod seems like a bad idea for both clubs.

actually not........if you make uefa system where 3 spanish teams go directly, whille 4th plays winner of bulgarian champion vs. 2nd israeli team in qualys. in 99% of time you will still get 4th spanish team in el. but yeah others deserve their chance, not to metnion 5th german team or 9th spanish

2nd it won't destroy balkan clubs.....first i don't know where do you get idea that our clubs developed basketball players??? only club that did it good was partizan in recent years, and their results showed that

cibona, olimpija, zadar and so on didn't do anything....this A licsense they had and so on only made them buy cheep foreginers and vets for short term projects....all this leaqd cibona to collaps same as zadar

good period, besides 80 for cibona was from 94. to 02-03. where cibona developed rimac, mulamerovic, giricek, planinic and also was bringing sesar, zizic, kus, mamic, prkacin in team from other clubs

when cinbona got a licesse all it become penn, davison, (well atleast they were good)...and tons of bad foreginers like hooskin, smith, ayuso, 3 kelly and so on...only players cibona developed were andric, markota and radosevic...lol

even worse was zadar who wennt in unfair race with cibona for el and all what is left huge depts

and same goes for olimpija

so yeah, cibona, zadar or olimpija were not destroyed because they developed players, but becuse they tried to folow path of rich el clubs. only club that still stands is partizan and it's because they stayed "old school" and developed krstic, perovic, tripkovic, tepic, velickovic, vesely, pekovic...
 
As expected:

1) Barcelona, Olympiacos, Maccabi, Panathinaikos
2) Montepaschi, Real, CSKA, Caja Laboral
3) Khimki, Partizan, Alba, Efes
4) Unicaja, Lietuvos Rytas, Zalgiris, Fenerbahce
5) Prokom, Armani Jeans, Brose Baskets, Union Olimpia
6) Cedevita, Besiktas, Elan Chalon, team QR.

http://www.euroleague.net/news/i/98487/180
 
As expected:

1) Barcelona, Olympiacos, Maccabi, Panathinaikos
2) Montepaschi, Real, CSKA, Caja Laboral
3) Khimki, Partizan, Alba, Efes
4) Unicaja, Lietuvos Rytas, Zalgiris, Fenerbahce
5) Prokom, Armani Jeans, Brose Baskets, Union Olimpia
6) Cedevita, Besiktas, Elan Chalon, team QR.

http://www.euroleague.net/news/i/98487/180

It means that Barca can't have Real or Caja in the 2nd sead, so they have 50:50 CSKA or Siena (again...)
 
I would like a group with
Olympiakos
Real Madrid
Alba Berlin
Fenerbahce
Armani Milano
Besiktas.
 
You know, we ( me included ) are so used to bash Jordi, so we automatically blast him for every action, no matter if there are better alternatives.

Let's implement the system you suggested. Each win in EL/EC = 2 pts, loss = 1 pts , going up each phase ( Regular->Top16->Playoffs->Final Four ->Final ) gives 1 pts bonus . All is based on sport results and fair , right ?


That's what we get for 3 year cycle per country:

CountryPoints
Spain131
Greece124
Israel116
Italy109
Russia104
Adriatic76
Germany74
Turkey73
Lithuania72
Czech70
Poland55
France46
Belgium31
Ukraine29
Latvia28
Bulgaria8
Holland8

[
[

The total sum of points = 1154, so if we divide it by 24 ( places in Euroleague ) , we'll get fair amount of places for each country, right ?
1154/24 = 48 . So gaining 48 points gives a country a place in EL.

That's what we get:
CountryFair places in EL
Spain2.7292
Greece2.5833
Israel2.4167
Italy2.2708
Russia2.1667
Adriatic1.5833
Germany1.5417
Turkey1.5208
Lithuania1.5000
Czech1.4583
Poland1.1458
France0.9583
Belgium0.6458
Ukraine0.6042
Latvia0.5833
Holland0.1667
Bulgaria0.1667

[

If we round up the numbers Spain, Greece deserved 3 places , Israel , Italy, Russia, Adriatic, Germany, Turkey, Lithuania - 2, Czech, Poland, France, Belgium - 1, Ukraine, Latvia - sorry no places left

Basically ultra-fair system will throw out power houses like Caja Laboral and Valencia , just to get Maccabi Ashdod , Panionios and Nymburk . Adriatic will get 2 places instead of the current 3+1.

Do you really want such system ?

It looks fine to me. At least it makes more sense than Jordi's "system".
 
Back
Top