Leaving aside the moonlanding hoax theories, if Apollo 11 indeed landed - why haven't there been additional landings? Why didn't Soviet spacecraft ever land?
There are no publicly known information on new planned missions to the Moon, and Apollo 11's mission was cut short. I find this a very intricate puzzle. A prevailing norm among ufo theorists is that there may very well be alien moon bases on the dark side of the moon, invisible to the public, and that NASA has airbrushed segments of moon photos (in some instances it appears fairly possible judging by landscape maps and contours)
Some interesting info:
and
Theres also a cryptic Neil Armstrong message on YT on this subject.
There are no publicly known information on new planned missions to the Moon, and Apollo 11's mission was cut short. I find this a very intricate puzzle. A prevailing norm among ufo theorists is that there may very well be alien moon bases on the dark side of the moon, invisible to the public, and that NASA has airbrushed segments of moon photos (in some instances it appears fairly possible judging by landscape maps and contours)
Some interesting info:
According to Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, two massive alien spacecraft were waiting there to greet him as he and the Apollo 11 Lunar Module touched down on the moon’s surface in July 1969.
Alleged conversations between Armstrong, Mission Control and an unnamed professor also disclose the reasons behind the US government’s shock decision to cancel the Apollo Moon Landing program in 1973.
It was in response to an alien warning.
Alleged conversations between Armstrong, Mission Control and an unnamed professor also disclose the reasons behind the US government’s shock decision to cancel the Apollo Moon Landing program in 1973.
It was in response to an alien warning.
For the past 40 years the rumour mill has spun itself out of orbit with claims about what Armstrong actually said following his historic moonwalk.
Though the images were grainy, and the quality of the transmission poor, millions of Americans none the less heard Armstrong’s now-immortal “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” speech.
But it is what he is alleged to have said next that has caused such fierce debate – and no small controversy – across the intervening decades.
Through the crackle and pop of what many believe was a deliberately contrived poor-quality broadcast, Armstrong was heard to say he could see a “light” on the rim of a nearby crater. Mission Control responded with a request for more information, following which the transmission went dead.
For a full two minutes nothing was heard…
Though the images were grainy, and the quality of the transmission poor, millions of Americans none the less heard Armstrong’s now-immortal “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” speech.
But it is what he is alleged to have said next that has caused such fierce debate – and no small controversy – across the intervening decades.
Through the crackle and pop of what many believe was a deliberately contrived poor-quality broadcast, Armstrong was heard to say he could see a “light” on the rim of a nearby crater. Mission Control responded with a request for more information, following which the transmission went dead.
For a full two minutes nothing was heard…
Theres also a cryptic Neil Armstrong message on YT on this subject.
Comment