Originally posted by maccabeo
View Post
On defense, I can either make Langford or Sofo try to beat me one-on-one and see, if they can score enough points or I can double and triple Sofo, close the lane for Langford and risk getting scored on by others. Theory is one thing, reality a different one. Maccabi's offense is easy to read but try to prevent it, if Maccabi always has the better center and the better SG. If talking about predictability, Charleroi played a more versatile basketball than Maccabi. But is there any doubt, which is the better team? No.
also, the more u search for the arch, the more your opponent cant cover at theyr best, the paint
plus mta has very good shooters:blu mallet scheyer pnini. is not a casuality that mallet and scheyer are not considered.
about the fact that every team study his future opponent, this could be truth or not. there are many coaches who prefer having a team that play the same basket always. no matter who is the opponent. in soccer , coaches like guardiola, conte,hiddink, wenger, never will change theyr soccer way of be because of the opponents skills.
anyay if blatt study his nex opponent's offense, well ,simply numbers says that training the team todefend the arch, is not his best quality
anyay if blatt study his nex opponent's offense, well ,simply numbers says that training the team todefend the arch, is not his best quality
Comment